We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Legal processes are always long...at least we've got a date now for the first time, first half of 2024. We didn't expect it to be this long, we had rumours last year it would be concluded by Christmas, which is why it's tough. Everyone concerned is naturally getting edgy.
We don't know anything about this extension, such as extended from when? They might have been asked to submit something like supporting evidence, we don't know. But there's no reason to believe the final date for the decision is changed in any way, which is first half of 2024.
So for those for whom it is more serious...do you have anything more than a mean spirited kicking? I took profit myself if you remember but have always been and still am hopeful for a good outcome here eventually, I'm not as you say a desperado. Have you had a bad day on SAGA, that you have to come on here telling us how clever you are?
So I'm desperate and you're losing the plot. The appointment is a fact, the person is a fact, who they are is something we'll know in due course and that's acceptable to me and I consider myself informed of it. The situation we're in is a fact based on a fact and you know what that is as well as I do. You're entitled to your opinion but if you bully people they're entitled to fight back, who do you think you are.
We discussed the fact and considered the fact and had a view on the fact and unless the Company are lying to us the RNS is evidence of the fact that an appointment has been made. They are apparently pleased with the appointment and he or she has qualities we've been told that would make them something other than nondescript; nondescript meaning undistinguished, featureless, characterless, unremarkable, etc but non unnamed.