Member Info for Summit

Sure bamps can defend and we fully understood whst was meant

The beneficiaries of these metals will be brics economies and they may gey a competitive edge. Ironic something made in China made with Russian metal could end up in UK anyway so its all a nonsense

If u take out the politicians and apply the golden rule what do u get?

Wouldn't want toffers to be my mate...think he would give u a good kick when u felt down

Telfer mine and scrap metal less environmental restoration costs = 0

Groundhog day good flying duck

I'm talking about if you did...I'm not saying we would just the fool Hardy nature of a potential outcome

paulb76 what a stupid idea. if ur a shareholder you want to destroy the value in full and force insolvency? never heard such ****e in all my days

Another straw man argument...

It's hard to lose an electronic record which is backed up every day. Catastrophe would delay rather than preclude a sale. Straw man argument

I think you will find directors insurance covers management and personal liabilities which can include negligence claims...muppett

It's at the discretion of the directors your case is moved

No indemnity no shares no **** off

Queeld knew it had a problem with no certificate and it seems did not buy the indemnity or produce evidence of it. An offer is not an indemnity and it is as the directors see fit....

When churakov sold so could we..are we jumping for compensation ?

Toffers remove your option as it will crash and burn your wotsits :

In the company's articles of association or rule book it says in 9.6 "subject to articles 9.8 to 9.11 if a share certificate is lost, destroyed, defaced or worn out, it will be renewed on such terms, if any, as to evidence and indemnity as the Directors think fit and, in the case of defacement or wearing out, on delivery to the Company of the old certificate.:

It seems queeld etc may not have big legs and may jump up and down saying its not fair....

I remember a company wtg which had a similar situation where it looked like they were going to have to stump up a lot of cash.....they won the case....merit is everything. Queeld should have held in electronic form like most of us then no questions....

I also suspect eua have D&O insurance amongst other things so not going to worry

Offers of indemnity...it would have needed to be in place. You have to question timing. Like those who try to rescue a ruined career they could be trying anything to get it back by shoving dirt where it is not warranted. It deserves to fail imo.