Member Info for StukeyBlue

Sean , you may well be right, but we will worth more with all licences in order

seems odd no one has update going ons for an hour?

"Posters judge by their knowledge." doesn't mean anyone right or wrong

Your understanding of 'A' trades on a single transaction is totally correct, but I think you are wrong when circa 20 come at once (or within seconds of each other), which to me suggest that an Algo is controlling them.

We all have an opinion, but you are not allowing anyone prepared express am opinion that doesn't agree with your way of thinking. You have positioned yourself over the 5 years, I have been around as blog "Admin" - totally not acceptable.

What gives you the right to decide who is sensible and who is not?

Q

I have never acted/worked as a broker or MM. However I support RK's view on Algo trades, as invariably they come in blocks (all generally smallish trades). Most contributors to this forum, seem to me to suggest they have much larger holdings. So seems not quite right. I am sure no of trades comes contribute in arriving at a 'price' to move up or down. I am not (now anyhow) taking any issue with your firmly held mantra that every buy is to be matched by a sell. However I also believe a market maker has to have 'stock' to sell. If the computer controlling these Algos did it all in one transaction (or 2/3) they probably be withheld (as being outside "normal" market size.
My view - I don't want to discuss all night

Silly suggestion you will not be able to post it

Screen shot it?

Hubris, he isn't looking at the right stock on TSX.

This has probably been posted but haven't seen it. What holdings to BHP & Newcrest have in GCP?

Are these holdings large enough to negate the effect of their dilution of their holdings in SOLG?

Cut out Christmas and two weeks in October so 9 weeks left, not long

Bozi
I am on that page, but it was stressed yesterday the 'merger' was intended to be wrapped up quickly, and it was also suggested that CGP could sell their SOLG directly to a third party. Nothing guaranteed .

Bozi
The reason for this statement about potential sale, is that for a company with very little cash, why include a clause to the effect they could pay 20% (circa £30m) in cash for CGP shares?

Bozi
Any one of them. I don't feel we know the whole story on the outliers, plus there was a block very near to a Lundium (?) mine that they might know about the geology there, and for a time was mentioned in dispatches..
I was not stating fact, just a suggestion

What crossed my mind was the sale of one of the other prospects, that would produce enough cash to help subdue the dilution caused by the extra CGP share issue

Rachael doesn't always win, but she does

I do not know whether you a jump racing follower, but living in Ireland as I do, every interview with Rachael Blackmore is answered by, "Ah Look ......".
Perhaps DC has Irish roots despite ZZZ's in his surname!!

Horse

I thinking you have been hiding your brain in the nosebag

Quady , it is Investor meet. There is a link 50 messages back (or similar)

As we know extremely small %, but opened (or shortly after) +21.7%

I have been watching paint dry for months, good buying today, even Aim dealer now SqeSx (?( or similar back involved all buys