RE: Is NM lying19 Jan 2019 11:31
Quady, you come from a scientific background do you? So what - so do I. You've picked out all of the facts there and omitted the greater part that was your opinion - fine, let's dissect your latest post.
"BHP tried to make a bid and was rebuffed. " Fact agreed.
"NM says he wants to extract maximum shareholder". Fact agreed - he has said that. Note the fact is that he SAID that, not that it will happen. Of course, logic, as distinguished from facts, would suggest that he will do everything he can to make this happen as he is a significant shareholder.
"NM says he is taking this to production" The fact here, as above, is that he SAID that, not that this is ACTUALLY going to production.
"If you carry on digging holes you burn cash". Self-evidently a fact. The holes don't dig themselves. Digging holes adds more value than it costs when you've got something as prospective as SOLG has. Can't remember what the cost per ounce so far is, but I do remember that it's rather tasty.
And that whole diatribe was to support the fact that you think NM means it when he says this is going to production under SOLG...the FACT is Quady that he has to say this is going to production under SOLG regardless of whether or not it is true. He would be an absolute fool to do otherwise, and clearly he is a canny businessman.
You may come from a scientific background Quady but I remain unimpressed.