Member Info for Strangy83

With regards to MTD.

Why ask someone on the board?

It is about the science and will / can vary based upon cohorts and reaction / illness condition of the cohorts.

Avacta will when possible reach this. When this happens is variable.

I have no idea what and why WYNBORE you had to explain fud and then give your normal sermon.

Let's hope so.

Welcome your optimism.

Should find out by end of play Monday next week...

Yes this is a plus.

The accounts will be critical.

With regards to turbines still a big question mark given the time it is taking to just manage x4.

More news and investment at Usk energy park may be a plus.

Also not really had any news about the 28mw of turbines for Meygen so this is also news that investors want.

Another week to go...if beyond this then another date and target not achieved....

Https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12302201/Should-doctors-warn-women-breast-cancer-hair-not-grow-chemo.html#comments-12302201

Elaborate then if you would Warren WYNBORE???

Apols that is what I meant 1 scheme with the second provisional 120mw. This was discussed after acceptance with the live video from the council.

Interesting reads.

Green hydrogen is the way forward but again this is just a BB throwing out what SAE could do?

Currently my cautionary note would be we do not have the foggiest really on what the future plans are for BESS after first 230mw?

Pellets probably dead in the water pardon the punt.

Meygen...transformational under the right conditions and with funding and ring fenced projects via CFD.

Hence let's get the basics in place with some stability and the audited accounts before jumping into another technology.

I am sure Usk showed us that although generally a good bridging technology, in the wrong place and wrong time it comes down to a few politicians views or public pressure...

Stay safe

It is interested ring with a 230 and a 460 mw Bess.

The 460 in construction expected to go live end 2024.

If this is £40m over 30 years then what will the 230 be?

Given that there are apparently more projects then this could be the goose that lays the golden egg to keep the lights on for SAE.

So if the accounts do measure up and they can dot the I's and the Ts then who knows.

It is certain that the future of SAE will depends on how the Energy Park Works.

If successful it will give the revenue and keep the tidal ventures at Meygen going.

So BESS is now critical to the company.

Over the coming weeks I think things will either go full belly up or we could see a mini revival.

Let's see...

WYNBORE

What's answer to bond conversion.

WYNBORE

Bond conversion

I get the links etc but no SAE?

Yes there is the Crown estate and Meygen but would expect SAE there in name not fronted on the project.

Plus SAE no longer make turbines so more aligned to Proteus IMO

Why don't you get involved Thorn and communicate to others then....

Makes excellent reading.

I have read your thread on Twitter.

Reasonable but unrealistic as you have basically listed everyone.

The point you seem to have missed is that 6000 is working.

It is actually exceeding expectations.

IMO given the 6-18 months every investor makes a decision based upon their timelines.

I am at ease with the technology not only 6000 and 3996 but also Affimers which imo is the golden egg.

Also given how much they enthused about using with other potent chemo medicines imo is a fantastic USP that the others in your list don't compare.

But to be fair we all have our views

Stay Safe

The link information says all was done successfully.

So I am confused as the RNS that all relate to the 4th turbine.

Not one in one out.

I fully understand why has it is the economics of having it done once with the ship in situ.

MY issue is if the info is correct then we have 3 turbine that are generating potential revenue.

Surely forward planning would be to have a back up. This relates to having turbines.

If there is only 4 full stop then I am lost with the planning. If they get BESS over the line then they must surely get 4 in the water.

Going forward the technology is fantastic but the companies Comms are terrible

So it was completed on 28th June by PROTEUS Staff.

No news yet from SAE?

Looked at the image and could not make out what if it was a euro flag.

It did state AHH

Which is the original modified 1500

Very interesting and again bizarre.

No RNS?