Member Info for stockdale

Jm1973, Watch the SP movement on Friday. As the SP dropped the de-ramp posts came on here from the usual suspects. Twitter also lit up at the same time from garyn etc.. Some are coordinating the attacks and they are successful. The after hours big buys show that. Others have pointed out they have tried buying at the lower price during Friday without success. It may well be a conspiracy theory but watching all the inputs makes you suspect strongly.

The ramps are essentially just stating the company position and the value of the company in relation to the Palladium and other minerals. That's essentially just information you can take or leave.

True dealer55. The trouble is they effect some by scaring them into selling. That way their shares become available for the big buys. See Friday after hours big buys. So ignoring isn't always the best way. Sometimes you have to post the facts of the company to stop people getting scared and selling. These forums do have an effect.

Some may say Cindy and others are working for the big buyers to encourage selling to release shares for the big buyers. Some may say. I couldn't possibly comment.

I think the bulls have it. The bulls have it. Unlock!

Good points Kabaa at 12:37 and 12:46. Impeccable logic and historically accurate with other buyouts.

My calculation is ONLY on Palladium. There's plenty of others.

They could recover more, even a lot more. 5% is the generally accepted minimum. The geology surveys will give an expected outcome. They're not going to publish those.

Based on minimum industry norms.

Another way of putting what I said earlier PDM.

And then there's the simple maths: Confirmed Palladium = 2 million ounces at $1800 an ounce = $3.6 billion = £2.75 billion. 5% recoverable = £138 million. That equals 5.5p per share.

Confirmed Palladium = 2 million ounces ate $1800 an ounce = $3.6 billion = £2.75 billion. 5% recoverable = £138 million. That equals 5.5p per share.

A bit of simple maths for you all. Not 'ramping'. Just the facts.

Charts only work when there's a stable established position. That's not the case here. This will ONLY drop if pushed down by those wishing to buy in. Why would they be interested in buying in unless they have confidence in the company? Surely it's a contradiction to say they will wait for a drop to buy in? If they have confidence in the company they should expect a rise when the minimum MCap valuation is greater than 4p. If they're expecting a drop then they surely don't have confidence in the company?

A misunderstanding from the interview. Possibly due to the Russian accent. Possibly due to malicious posts here and elsewhere. Any dividends that may appear could ONLY be to all shareholders. There is no mechanism where Director shareholdings ONLY could get dividends.

COdey, Investors buy and sell on emotion, confidence and fear. I am interested in all sensible view points. Your viewpoint is an extreme one in looking at a lower SP than the current 2p when the confirmed assets alone show a valuation in excess of 4p (£100 million MCap). As I have said this will ONLY drop tomorrow on the fear and uncertainty of some investors generated by your posts and a coordinated group of others.

Thanks for that info Silverite. Legal issues with a shareholder is a matter between them and the law. It doesn't effect other shareholders unless the company itself is implicated.

COdey if you're not interested in our welfare then why post at all? You have an opinion. Post it once. Don't keep pushing it as if you wish to effect other's opinions. Don't get offended by other's posts.

I read posts here for info that I may have missed. I post to see what others think and to askabout issues. That is all.

Something to consider for next week: The large buys on Friday amounted to a total of about £868,520. The buyers of that amount will not wish to see their investment tank to 1.5p or anything below what they paid. They will wish to see a profit build over the days and weeks. If they were responsible for the coordinated attack by employing the derampers here and on Twitter and shorting the stock they will not wish to see a repeat of that. If it happens then we may see a contest between large new investments and the large Friday buyers. Or we may see a clearer rise in the SP to satisfy the Friday buyers of those very large amounts. Just a thought.

Kabaa, there are some nasty pieces of work out there who are paid to de-ramp shares like this. You only have to see the large buys declared after the close. Those buys were bought cheaply for an enormous discount on the price they would have paid. It's worth their while paying for coordinated attacks by various means to ensure they get their cheap price.

If anything it shows how good this company is if big buyers are willing to go to all that trouble to get the shares as cheap as possible. It's the anti robjprofit argument of why wait to 1.5p when that would surely indicate a problem with the company, unless of course the lower price is engineered by manipulation. The result has to be they believe the SP will go much higher or why bother?

Like it Jarv, after the rugby downer and the earlier nonsense on here.

Yeah watched the rugby and this on my tablet at the same time. South African won that rather than England losing it. They won the scrum and moving the ball. England were forced into making mistakes because of SA pressure. Unlike against the All Blacks where the free flowing game game allowed England to play.

You have a point sxx as if you don't have confidence in a company or it's asset now why would that suddenly change at 1.5p? Surely the danger would then be why had it fallen to 1.5p?