Member Info for SteveJones999

Yep, as per normal follow the data.

And now analysts talking "soft landing"... what did I say over a year ago when everyone was shouting "recession" and so on? I said "soft landing"... :-)

Boom- I hope you read my earlier email and acted accordingly...

Nope Mr T- for example it could have been you, Pam could be you- this is my point.

Pam was setup as an ID yesterday, anyone here can set up multiple ID's in seconds, just using different email addresses. One of the issues with free BB's alas.

Could be someone doing this for fun, or not, you decide.

Back on planet earth...

https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendar

You fail to consider the obvious Mr T.

What impact will technology have?

The change here is exponential- in the last few years, proving nothing is linear.

There will be exponential change with AI and derivatives of this- the world is moving to renewables, which is a start and who knows where this will take us- one thing is certain, humans have the innate desire to exist, this existence to reproduce and control, may well lead us all into a virtual world in 70 years, fulfilling our desires without additional resource impact, in fact reducing it.

You need to expand your thought process.

As I've said before, work within the system that exists and maximise your potential unless you are a direct change agent, which is a different story.

Oh god, more doom- how on enough can you pay attention to a prophecy 50 years ago? They are literally millions and millions of prophecies over the centuries and I could make one up in a second... and if it becomes right, will I be seen as a genius lol.

You could, of course, quote all the millions and millions of prophecies that were wrong lol.

I predict in 60 years there will millions more prophecies covering every possible permutation and by the rule of average, at least 1 or more will be right.

Now quote me on this in 70 years....

Yep, you're on permanent transmit... balance Mr T, balance.

If you'd listened to many over the years you wouldn't have been in such a dire position.

I got bored with your post Mr T.

You clearly haven't been on this board else you don't read it.

You ALWAYS agree with with Cowchain, and never pull him up on anything.

From this I can assume you and Cowchain are in fact the same person.

Try and listen to others, you will learn something.

Cowchain and his sidekick Tibbs don’t listen to info from Cey- part of their remuneration is linked.

Also, directors cannot buy share when they are in possession of privileged, price sensitive info.

Not saying this is definitely the case at this present time, but not known if not either.

All this pair do is diss the company- I suspect Cowchain is bitter having lost so much in this company- he needs to let go.

So the charts reveal the normal then Tony, the SP could go up or it could go down- who’d have thought this- (meant in good humour)

When aisc falls and gold rises it’s good- the prob has been the upward trajectory of the aisc exceeding the upward trajectory of the product it sells

I only agreed with you on his rationale for the poor SP. If he delivers on the timeframes in the presentation, the rise will be way quicker than you say and will be after what I pointed out

Cey will take off if q4 delivers and lower end is met for the year- this is a big ask but Horgan seems convinced this will be case.

The presentation said it all- so will take off if this is comes to fruition

My view is FED will keep rate the same, with the same message "will do what is necessary" and hike again if needed- which will be unlikely. Will the markets interpret as hawkish or dovish? Place your bets...

I listen last night and all looked good apart from the rationale for the dire SP.

It's "jam in the future" but the future is getting ever closer and is consistent with what has reported thus far, so good.

My first question 1) was confirmed as "will meet" but detail as to how which was disappointing

My second question was also partially met, eg 80% through, although I can estimate at the rest of the questions based on the project AISC drop

I gave feedback at the end of the webcast as they requested, this was my feedback "The reason the SP is so low is because the costs have risen faster than the gold price has due to inflation pressures, and production is yet to get back to the 500k. Futures look good and in control though- just would have liked these reasons and not geo political and mid cap stuff which doesn't seem correct to me."

Irrelevant on support line Tony.

Facts and events drive indices not charts, charts simply respond to events.

Data yesterday PCE etc was surprised once again on the upside, so the FED bets are poised on hawkish, still, and we all know what this means- potential on rate hike remains on the table.

It's really as simple as this.

It already has :-)

Hit I mean- need an edit button.