Member Info for SteveJones999

Quick headline scan looking good!

As I see it:

Last financial year 440,974 - AISC 1,399 - Av Gold Price 1,794

Q4 last financial year was 109,564

This Year so far:

Q1+Q2+Q3 = 321,921, therefore 128,079 needed to meet the minimum for the year:

Q1 AISC was 1,348

Q2 AISC was 1,228

Q3 AISC was 1,226

If the min annual guidance gets hit- the Q3 to Q4 increase will be very large and also Q4 last year to this year; the annual amount mined will be an increase also although slight.

If the AISC is similar to the first 3 quarters this year it will be in target and a fair slug lower on Year On Year, and within target.

Therefore, if the OZ target is met I would have thought the market would react accordingly, especially considering the annual gold price will higher.

It's, as always, how you feel if you trade:

1) are you happier to miss out on a possible jump and try to get in on a rise, but remove the risk of a drop if results are poor?

2) are you OK with a possible loss but don't want to miss out on possible jump?

On the 19th Oct (OK so only about 3 weeks into Q4, Horgan stated in the RNS that the annual guidance will be met despite the bumper Q4 needed, albeit lower end, and the AISC will be in the lower end).

Only you can make this choice...

GLA.

In the title

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-67998084

You have more sources than Heinz Mr T. By the law of averages they will always be right at some point as well as being wrong- reminds me of that old Johnny Ball show “think of a number”- and if your latest number is indeed correct, it will still be pure luck. At some point you have to right.

M Henderson- you also said “ and for the answer for your question ..there is another Lie by the end of year to trying to achieve the year target numbers.”

Was it from your same source that now invalidates this by making 450k?

Nice one Spoony :-).

S&P futures bust through the 4,800! Of course as I said earlier, all depends on CPI later today

US CPI will have a big impact if a big move away from consensus either way- we all know which way is positive here

My cryptos are going great guns Tony :-)

Not frustrating at all for traders Mr Tibbles- what a weird statement.

Economics for trading, have you not understood anything?

It must be frustrating for holders, as no scheduled info out until 18Jan.

You've got this the wrong way round!

No worries Dasut- we have our own strategies which is fine and good luck to you.

If you look at the gold price in 2020 high in around July- 3.5years ago, it’s almost the same as it is today and yet inflation has gone bonkers since then- so this has been a primary issue- hence my posts for last few years have always banged on about inflation. If the price of what you sell doesn’t alter much but the costs of getting it do, that’s always gonna be a massive with all else being equal (whereas cey invested on several things during this time which made it even more twitchy - access to extra funds if required and gold price hedge were mitigations to these risks). This is a great trading stock for those who want to avoid the risk of simply holding and relying on dividends that can also drop or be stopped and then you could be left with a poor sp so poor capital- any strategy is ok with me- we have to pick the best ones that work for us, we can only blame or congratulate ourselves for our decisions. They all have risks and benefits.

Hi Dasut,

No actual results in RNS.

This has happened many times before- actual results move SP.

Along with this economic data- I posted a link yesterday to key data out this week and the times the data will drop- the obvious one(s) in there(Thurs and Fri) will have the greatest chance for a move in gold, markets and hence CEY.

Outside of this, any RNS with actual meaningful results in it, and at a minimum, hitting the projected target in the RNS release on 18th Jan.

Mt Tibbles,

Your lack of intellect is only superseded by your lack of IQ.

Again, yet another cut and paste, of old, old info, that most here (like me) will have already read, digested and taken a view on.

And yet again, you provide zero input other than cut and paste.

My view was so what... the rev is estimated, the 450k is planned so nothing outside of what is already known from other sources. Hence the SP failed 2 move a couple of weeks ago on any of this.

You really are a little wally- kind of funny though.

"tibbles" - meaning: "Tibbles are data frames that are lazy and surly: they do less (i.e. they don't change variable names or types, and don't do partial matching) and complain more (e.g. when a variable does not exist)"

Kind of apt!

Enjoy your day.

Yawn Mr Tibbles, same old drivel, same old cut and pastes, same old insults- break a habit of a lifetime and post some useful- but that would take a level of intelligence that you sadly lack

Why don’t you post in the RNS that has just come out? Not that your view holds any weight- quite the opposite.

Yawn Mr T.

I gave up the first few lines of your first paragraph- didn't bother with the rest as I know there will nothing relevant, just more attempts at self justification and deflection.

All pointless really.

Yawn, more passive aggression from Mr T.

One day he'll surprise all on this forum, and post something of relevance instead of his usual, out of date, copy and paste waffle, and insults.

Usual passive aggressive nonsense from Mr T- some things never change…

You repeat these way after the event Mr T- the key is always at the point the data is released, hence I post this.

Pointless reading repeats and move as already occurred .

Most likely to do with the intraday gold prices and market data Tony.

Last 5 days:

CEY down ~8%

FRES down ~10%

HOCHS down ~11%

Https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendar