Member Info for Stackhigher

That's settled, jack. Will you take your ball home now?

Was I dreaming when I bought a few in the 5s yesterday, novice? The 5s that weren't happening last time we were in the 7s?

You're absolutely tapped mate. Put it on record- do you think it's only up from here (6.2p)? You know as well as I do this will drop again fairly soon, but you won't be gloating that day, you'll be deflecting. How far under are you that you've got to ramp every day? I have a bit of pity for you, but rather than accept help and advice you brainlessly ramp, confirming how desperate you are.

I now predict you'll write some fantasy about trading with expert timing, and say i don't need to worry about you because you're rich, when really you've bet the farm on terribly timed top ups and you're angry/jealous that I've called it right

CMG, you either didn't read my post, or can't read. I'm not ruling anything out.

CMG, which tier 1 mine are you looking at? The investment you hold is in a very poorly performing exploration company who have only ever raised cash from investors. If that company goes bust, the gold and copper is still there for someone else, but no one with deep pockets is going to be charitable to solg. If (and it is an if) there is an appetite for mining cascabel after the election, the government don't care who it is. If solg go bust and someone else swoops in for the license, they get the same outcome (but probably quicker).

I have a hedge in case we get extremely lucky, but there's more chance this doesn't make it, looking at the market

If solg don't get the next share of steam cash soon, because they fail to make necessary progress, how many shares do you think they'll need to print down here? 300m? 10%? That might keep paying the wages for a few more months.

So still nothing to counter the enormous body of evidence linking anthropological co2 emissions to increasing temperatures?

You can throw as much rubbish about COVID on this board as you like, it won't cover the fact that you've once again come up short. That's the problem with entrenching yourself on a 'team' rather than reviewing the evidence and thinking for yourself... Sooner or later someone is going to show you up.

How come I haven't had a car park threat yet? Your failure to understand science usually results in a childish outburst. Are you off the shandy?

Slug, you realized I was right, didn't you? Did you look up other attempts to explain the spike in temperature and finally conclude the same as the educated people? Well done! And that explains why you went in an (equally unhinged) rant about COVID instead of explaining why big oil money can't find a link to another factor that stands up to scrutiny.

CMG, if you read my post, then slug's completely bats***, unrelated reply and concluded that somehow he won, you are as simple as novice. 😜

Volcanic activity caused them to be that high.

Any questions about how CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, just ask. You'll get there 👍

Climate change loons cling to the lack of an absolute link between fossil fuel-caused co2 increases and increased temperatures like it is their silver bullet. The awkward thing for them is that all other theories presented as to why temperatures are spiking in line with anthropological CO2 emissions have been disproven (including a lovely study into solar flairs funded by a pro oil think tank 😂). The outcome? No theory has survived simple scrutiny.

Feel free to suggest one, slug. Scientists will test it, others will try to tear apart their tests. That's how science works... But you'll know that, because you're a Durham mathematics alumni 😕

Got me, CMG. You do an excellent impression of a moron. I totally fell for it. 👍

You're as delusional about that as you are about your interactions with Nal, CMG. It's not a surprise that you can't see who is right, you appear to have the emotional intelligence of a toddler and the IQ of a marrow.

Slug gets taken in by online s*** stirrers who use needy people like him as foot soldiers. Did you see him coming on here to talk about davos yesterday? Notice he didn't reply when I pointed out that this was literally the only place he could think of to discuss such things. The poor chap is tragic... Is that why are drawn to him?

Ask him if he understands the interaction between CO2 (levels of which are shooting up, and we can tell the increase is caused by burning fossil fuels) and increased infrared absorbtion.... Then see who has their pants round their ankles

Slug, one day you might understand why you are the classic fool, and a conspiracy theorist's dream. I've offered to educate you before so that you don't sound so foolish. I can teach you about relative isotopic abundance, about how CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, about how we measure important data. Literally any of it is easy to teach- you can understand it. Or you can pop on a tin hat, listen to people whose interests are transparent to anyone with eyes, and embarrass yourself: your choice. But don't make me out to be the one who has been mislead, when the evidence is both overwhelming and on my side ❤️

You couldn't see it, cmg

This is the only place you had to post this, isn't it slug? Did you realize all your WhatsApp groups are empty, and none of the staff at you local pub care? 😕

Tragic

Aqua, I don't think NAL tends to abuse people who show concerns. I think you're mistaken.

Just have a little read before you post; it will definitely help 👍

Actually, the way this is moving, they might choose not to buy because they're worried it's heading to zero. Today it has experienced quite the sharp decline...

People don't necessarily need to sell, red. They might choose to get the same share cheaper next week 👍

I'll ask again: When did the other $67m land, red? I thought we'd only had $33m so far. Can you share the RNS saying we're fully funded (that we actually have the money from the stream deal)?

What's written here doesn't change the sp red. If it did, your ramping would be meaningful.

If it makes people buy or sell, that's their issue.

When did the other $67m land, red? I thought we'd only had $33m so far. Can you share the RNS saying we're fully funded (that we actually have the money from the stream deal)?

Because one cannot 'talk down' a share. And whilst we're at it, 'Algos' don't 'walk down' the share. You just don't understand traders or trading 👍

Calm down, red. You can't 'talk the share price down'. Remember, nothing anyone says on here impacts the share price. People can say negative things about a company that has been exceptionally poorly managed. That won't cause the sp to drop.