Member Info for Stackhigher

Stas get yourself to an open mic night because that was an absolute zinger!! Smashed it! Top class humour! Hilarious! Because... Because what you did... And this is what's so clever... Is pretend you thought I meant 60p... Which is in itself an actual joke for a 6/7p company.

Debunked?! That's funny. I asked you if you needed help understanding how weighted averages are used in fluid dynamics and you changed the subject. Where was the debunking? You live in a fantasy world sluggy boy: there's no helping you. But then you said the global average temperature data used to monitor climate change was based on inaccurate data... You can't have it both ways poppet.

Anyway, we seem to be retreating from the highs of the day. Bets on how many days it takes for the sp to start with a 6 again, and for me to be polite and not say 'i told you so' to the top up brigade today?

Alas, not underwater. Sorry 😐

And slug, I can tell you're hurting. Thank you for admitting you were wrong about average temperatures yesterday: I'm sorry I don't share your view that those agencies making recordings are part of a big scam. The trouble with conspiracy theories is that they have a tendency to make you look a bit silly.... Like believing in water powered cars...

No short, but only a £90k hedge (now just over 90). So not desperate, but I won't be buying this current rise.

Follow the money, wait until they're cheap again.

Can you see any times in solgold's recent history where the sp hasn't moved up with the price of our two main metals?

Give me a shout if you need help 👍

I don't need to bonkers: a lack of big money will see the volume dwindle and it will cruise down all on its own 👍

Only a complete novice (read:idiot) would top up at these prices. Of course I want in lower, but I won't be buying £1-2m at these prices.

To all those topping up today, remember: it's better to buy shares at lower prices so you get more for your money. People buying today either haven't clocked experienced posters informing them it will go lower, or they don't want as many shares 🤷‍♂️

Strange behaviour

Wmc- March

Oz- May

Anglo - April

Don't let the truth get in the way of a good ramp though 🙄

Yes, Covid can kill.

China installed more renewables last year than anyone else. Why, if it's a busted flush? Why curtail the number of coal power stations they are building if that's a better idea? Why meet more of the latest additional demand with renewables? Clue: if you need another conspiracy theory to answer this, you're probably trying too hard.

But you do accept that it's not flat? When scaled, even despite ocean trenches and mountains it is smoother than a snooker ball, but we'll move on.

Did the moon landings happen?

Another 5 mins wasted 👍

Is the earth round or flat?

True, share market. I am not wasting too much time crushing this tool. Takes about 15 seconds per post to waste minutes of his life. Keeps the women and girls (or boys) around him safe for another evening.

As ever, it all boils down to a conspiracy theory. He does accept that it's possible to have a meaningful average, but he doesn't trust the dataset. A whole different issue.

Slug, last one for the night: is the earth a globe or is NASA lying to us? 🤣

You're describing arbitrary, unstandardized measurements and then claiming that their average is meaningless — which is absolutely true. But that’s not what fluid dynamics does.

In reality, global temperature datasets are based on standardized, quality-controlled measurements from weather stations, ocean buoys, satellites, and reanalysis models — all designed to capture air temperature at consistent heights, locations, and times, following protocols.

If you still can't understand this, maybe I can't help you. Have you ever been tested for autism? If not, you don't have to tell us here, but maybe get tested. Your fixed thinking is clear, and you seem to get upset when your incorrect understanding is challenged

News flash: temperature varies across space.

That’s exactly why scientists don’t use isolated numbers — they use area-weighted averages over many grid cells, with high spatial resolution, to estimate regional or global trends. These aren’t meant to predict the temperature at any single location like Wetherby or anywhere else: they’re used to track changes in the overall climate system.

Getting there? Have you been diagnosed autistic? Your fixed thinking and inability to respond to logic is pretty symptomatic.

How does the field of fluid dynamics work, slug?

You cannot take a mean of just temperatures, as you are suggesting scientists do.

Yes, temperature is intensive — that just means it doesn’t scale with system size. But you can absolutely average intensive properties to describe the system's typical state — as long as you weight correctly. That’s standard practice in physics. How do you think average concentrations are reported?

Guessing your Early Learning Centre degree didn't include any applications of maths? Still happy to teach you, even though you're being deliberately thick 👍

Thanks. Without that horrible example I wouldn't have been able to see why you're struggling. You haven't made any attempt to average by grid cell area. Like I say, I'm happy to teach you. Do you want to learn, or does that scare you? If you're happier in your ignorance that's cool 🤡

Still can't do it, can you. Your exact words were "it is all irrelevant anyway, as Toyota have developed an engine that runs on water".

Too funny 🤣

If you actually hold a degree in maths (dubious, given your general lack of intelligence and how easily you get taken in by conspiracy), I think it would be pretty easy to teach you how to take a weighted average, based on temperature and volume.

CMG, what's 'a beg or two'?

Slug, you've nearly proved which of us understands the science and which of us is clutching. If you can't do the maths that underpin most of our understanding of fluid dynamics, find someone to explain it to you. You'll feel enlightened, I promise. I can do it if you like, but this far you've proven yourself very resistant to help.

Final time for everyone unlucky enough to read your brain farts: do you still believe Toyota have developed an engine that 'runs on' water or have you realized that breaking O-H bonds is an endothermic process, hence making that impossible? I think if you start with accepting that, eventually you'll be ready to learn how a weighted average works.

It's not an argument. It's established fluid dynamics vs Facebook guff.

That's like saying the shape of the Earth is subject to argument. It's just simpletons attention seeking, or being unwitting stooges (useful idiots) for those who exploit the hard of thinking.