RE: philpot100128 Sep 2015 11:40
According to this morning's DT:
" The Anglo-Dutch oil giant said that it expects charges for the decision and would update the market later on the financial implications of the move, with the company carrying a $3bn exposure on its balance sheet for the assets and a further $1.1bn in contractual committments, totalling $4.1bn (£2.6bn).
"Shell continues to see important exploration potential in the basin, and the area is likely to ultimately be of strategic importance to Alaska and the US. However, this is a clearly disappointing exploration outcome for this part of the basin,” said Marvin Odum, director of Shell Upstream Americas. "
So, it's cheaper to leave the stuff where it is for the time being however long that might be.
Solar energy potential notwithstanding, I think that it's important not to underestimate petrochemicals: plastics, paints detergents, textiles, medical products, furnishings etc. 40% of clothing contains the stuff, sometimes as much as 100% of work clothing, and the content of a single sofa can include materials derived from up to 60 litres of the stuff.