Member Info for Spikeyj

More realistic I think than most of the stuff on here from the Kremlin nutters.

I thought you would be interested in this story from The Times:

'Starving' Russian troops turning to cannibalism, Ukraine claims.

… ? one dead russkie = one less manpower, but hey ho one more for supplies? … swings, roundabouts…

Russia’s Communist leader warns a 1917-style revolution may be on the way

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c6c1fcbd-ebbc-464e-b400-06a5f439f4a3?shareToken=a1931eb822a70765709cb16ee0b0d515

13:35, i can absolutely see where you are coming from, but as day follows night lackspittle lse admin will delete your post. …

… and they, of course, are the same folks who permitted folks like davidgreece, brokerman, mrselfridge & aberdeenman to facilitate fraud.

12:03, and yet you seem to think it’s funny to repeatedly mock the horrendous suffering and losses of the ukrainian people, who’ve had a pretty tough time of it since 2022.

… unlike AIM punters who made their own adult choices to bet a few quid on EUA shares, the ukrainians didn’t choose a russian invasion.

shame on you.

(but tbf, i can understand why you’re being snarky if you are indeed a large holder of EUA shares … cue sound of world’s smallest violin.)

Jmo, wolves90.

Yeah, I saw you mention ‘others’ but it is still only troajan you are challenging and naming directly. (and as you should know already from the history here, troajan has been posting in response to putin propaganda plentifully spammed by others, not the other way round.)

i simply don’t believe you, that you’ve not been posting about EUA before using other IDs.

if you want the quality of on-topic discussion here to improve, then try posting something about EUA yourself such as responding to the kind of comments and queries del has raised recently.

Wolves90, try posting to some of those repeatedly misusing this sharechat board to spread kremlin propaganda.

… it’s a p*ss poor look, that you just attempt to have a go at troajan about that, rather than post to others like cheesy, moonboy and richard.

curious why you chose to start up this sleeper account now created 12 years ago. ? i wonder, which accounts do you usually post from?

… perhaps no coincidence that you started posting roughly around the same time that dshox tried to spread lies about blackrock.

Cheesy, “He hates the company with a passion”

nope. you get way too emotional about this stuff, cheesy. i think this company’s underlying value is near zero, and i think the business is effectively uninvestable.

but it’s just a poor quality AIM share, not a person to love, hate, etc.

from my own perspective, EUA has just given me plenty of free entertainment and a few things to learn and think about. (so cheers EUA!)

… better to reserve strong emotions like ‘hate’ for people, humans who deserve it … putin being a fairly obvious example.

Wolves90, you don’t seem to object to posters such as cheesy and richard who spam this board, over and over, with off-topic kremlin propaganda.

… ? so why moan about troajan’s posts when you say nowt about the putin fanboys?

I note a few mentions of shergar, warren buffet, lord lucan and the ghost of elvis presley buying EUA again.

(mind you, i have no evidence for that, but dshox says that doesn’t matter, so i thought he might want to know.)

… mm, so dshox claims, ‘evidence doesn’t matter’ … lol, you’re on the right chatboard fellah.

“I note a few mentions of BlackRock buying EUA again.”

… evidence?

With the best will in the world, your track record with predictions for EUA is not great, mr b_positive.

Indeed, stan, yup, there’s always small print. but, no explanation why plans have changed, and now no new target date given.

? were the BoD just lousy planners, or has some additional problem developed? (e.g. intended buyer gazundering since they know EUA is bent over a barrel?)

presumably they will either have to complete before annual results are due, or at least convince auditors that the BoD have a “reasonably held belief” that the sale will complete ‘shortly’, in order to avoid qualification of the accounts re going basis concerns.

“Advancing and no negatives.”

lol — this company was forced into a fire sale to remain solvent. they announced that in december and said the deal would close at the end of *february*.

… now, two months overdue, this RNS admits that they still haven’t managed to complete that deal, and provides zero explanation for that.

presumably, the company was well aware of the general conditions in russia, the war, legal timeframes, etc, when they previously announced end of feb as the completion.

meanwhile, naughty cheesy tries to claim that there’s no reason why an AIM company teetering on the verge of insolvency should have to update its shareholders and the market when it’s failed to finalise a firesale two months after it had made a formal regulatory announcement to the market that it would be sorted by end feb. … nomad felt otherwise, imv.

But on the plus side, yet more bargain top-up opportunities for cheesy and carlito.

Len, EUA already threw in the towel back on 29/12. nothing left here but pro-putin propaganda.

“Closing is planned before 28 February.”

slow handclap for EUA.