Member Info for Spikeyj

morning prop, i am neither long nor short.

i don't think neo99, fonters, hepran, unclemonty, bloodaxe, picto,
dollop, williams142, etc. filled out theirs - they are probably still
waiting for the resurrection of WRN into a $2 billion conglomerate.

what could possibly go wrong?

kinda agree soyo, but amit/hairy/knightsbridge
peeps will make sure that your posts get deleted.

? maybe not so quick, lol?

sold a *small* slice.

nearly, but not quite.

added.

1

how many chickens can you count,
before those eggs are hatched?

dan, why assume that operational expenses are “including Admin”?
.. that is not how things are represented in the ADME accounts ...

i am perfectly prepared to believe that OO is ‘anti-dilution’.
me, I’m fairly anti-tax. but that doesn’t stop HMRC billing me.

... $2 million shares in ADME “at 7p” just means a certain number of
shares, doesn’t it? ERR & ADME could choose to label that number of
shares with whatever notional share price they wanted, just to make it
sound good. (to make EER sound like it’s worth more, & to make ADME
shares sound higher priced) but the notional share price used doesn’t
mean much unless ERR took shares instead of a genuine cash alternative.

(if i agree to sell you an old fort cortina for a hundred BP shares,
with you & i agreeing that those BP shares “are at £30 a share”,
that doesn’t mean that BP shares are really worth £30 a share, &
it certainly doesn’t mean that my old ford cortina is worth £3000.)

ragsrob: “Iam [sic] a holder a [sic] 250K.”

are you sure, ragsrob? - you’ve said some different
things at other times about your holding in EUA.

ragsrob, if it was already a ‘done deal’ then surely they wouldn’t have
needed to get UBS to hold an FSP? - which has the purpose of trying
to drum up interest from external parties in making a bid etc. there
were months on this board of multiple posters claiming that suspension
was to cover up the final bits of a deal being signed off involving CITIC etc,
so that a sale or deal would imminently be revealed ... but now it becomes
apparent that no takeover bid at all was received by EUA during those last
few months, so now they have ditched CITIC (or else effectively admitted
CITIC weren’t that involved in the first place) & are trying again via an FSP.

(i can see it’s exciting that EUA are trying to use UBS to sell part/all of
the company, but it’s hardly news that the BoD want to sell it, shurely?)

... still no production figures from WK (why not?) ...
... but EUA’s cash burn remains significant ...
... strange that dimitry let 1p warrants lapse ...
... interesting that their nomad resigned ...
... AIM suspended the share, but it still
... remains suspended months later...

i’ve said before, i *do* think EUA has a legitimate business, so if
they really want to sell it at a fair price then i presume they will
eventually be able to find a buyer, can’t see why not. but the key
bit remains, what will be an achievable valuation for such a sale.

(if dimitry thinks he can sell the company for £££s per share,
it is very odd indeed that he let those warrants at 1p lapse.)

so far so good. the RNS helps, i suppose.

‘morally corrupt’ is a matter of subjective opinion, in the main.

... difficult to successfully prosecute for defamation about a
subjective opinion... as to the hookers and cocaine, i guess
a jury would have to be convinced that reasonable readers
would take that seriously rather than just read it as satire or
hyperbolic caricature, and that is was not true, and that it
actually caused significant harm to someone’s reputation.

the litigant would presumably also need to consider whether
there was a realistic prospect of recovering any monies won from
litigation, and what might happen re costs apportionment.

(“honouring” probably too serious a word for a simple guessing game;
i just meant, what’s the point in betting on something if peeps won’t
stand by their bet? - wouldn’t do that betting on footie/boxing etc.)

brookkers, it was started by me just as a game,
i.e. a bit of fun not to be taken too seriously.

i kept it reasonably up to date, but i didn’t spam
the board with it every day as is happening now.

i am no longer updating it b/c posters including aandi & ginger hippo
S starting changing the guesses they had already made previously, rather than honouring the guess they had already made.

bletchleypark 48218, tick.

cgmarmion, agree with calamari, no
real incentive for IG to reduce margin.

the current situation still leaves open all possibilities of (A) no bid at all
being agreed, right through (Z) to the enthusiast’s dream of £££ takeover.

so from IG perspective, huge range of potential price movement from
near zero to £££ in a very short time frame they need to be ready for ...
so of course they prepare for it by asking you to pay a chunky margin.

10:29, china is a privately held
company? that explains a lot.