George Frangeskides, Exec-Chair at Alba Mineral Resources, discusses grades at the Clogau Gold Mine. Watch the full video here.
It’s absolutely terrifying. Totally corrupt and something fishy going on imo! My guess is this vaccine is merely a front to depopulate the world by making a decent percentage of this that take it infertile. They’ve done it in Africa for years now it’s the Western worlds turn...
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats
Anyone know anything about the Optigene lamp test which seems to have been validated on a government website today? Competition or not?
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats
Does anyone know anything about this product? Competition or not?
So ODX will be 3-4 months away from completing Tech Transfer for the Mologic LFT. Meanwhile Avacta have now completed their own Tech Transfer with BBI and are now very busy validating the first batch off the conveyor belt. My guess is this will be done by 14th Dec just in time for Boris’ big announcement... exciting times ahead of Avacta shareholders!
https://www.share-talk.com/immunodiagnostic-sys-idh-l-launch-of-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-tests/#gs.miftp6
SP up 26% today. Is it them?
So Oxford/AZ (by fluke/ accident), Pfizer and Moderna are all claiming 90-95% efficacy - this is simply the % of people who don’t get ill/ show symptoms. We’ve already been told 80% of people don’t show any symptoms anyway and that’s without any vaccination. I’m one of that 80% - I got it didn’t even know I had it. It is now coming to light that the miracle vaccination isn’t likely to stop people being infectious. I mean really what is the real tangible difference here? We were at 80% anyway and now with the vaccination we will be at 90%. We might as well really not bother with the vaccination it ain’t gonna make a difference (1 in 10). Test test test...
That is hocking PL and if true that doesn't bode well at all.
The nasal swab doesn’t need approval to tender you only need a prototype that works with an infrastructure in place to scale up manufacturing. We know it does he told us it does. There is no doubt in my mind that they have done the tender. The NDA will not allow them to tell us that they have though. The ducks are clearly lining up and it will be Boris who first addresses the nation with a clear roadmap on mass testing and vaccination for next year. My guess is that will be the 2nd week of December. Only
then will the eagerly awaited Avacta RNS’s be released for our increasingly anxious shareholders. In the meantime top up and hold. This will go like the clappers in 2-3 weeks...
I beg to differ with Agentb; Affimers is a direct link to Avacta. It might as well have said Avacta instead of Affimers! The link is clear as day. I agree it’s still not a slam dunk as we will wait fir the RNS on that but it makes this investment a lot more attractive. Buy buy buy...
https://twitter.com/buy_buy_bye/status/1331211043079675907?s=21
Great post. What did we really learn from the RNS today... we have learnt the saliva test is proving difficult but not impossible but we now also have a swab test. It appears Avacta are de risking their route to market which is a very wise move. It also means that whenever we have read about swab tests like we have over the last few weeks... it could actually be us that we are reading about!! We are obviously under NDA and my guess is these swab tests are already being piloted! If we do get this saliva test done it will be unique... there is nothing available like it! We are still going for gold but now have a plan b. Great stuff.
Good RNS for investors/ long term holders as it’s an update on progress and will give confidence. Also good for traders as it’s not the tech transfer complete that we are all waiting for. Share price should hold up well today...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history.html
Those claims are not lunacy Profit00 they are unfortunately FACT. Dodgy polio vaccines caused severe injuries to an unfortunate 700-800 thousand people...
A Portuguese court has ruled that the COVID PCR tests are unreliable and therefore their use to quarantine people is unlawful.
"A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that
“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.
This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.
The court’s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows:
“Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”
It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool.
The standard coronavirus tests are throwing up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.
This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].