Member Info for SouthernComfort

Hi Ace, you're still a voice of reason, good on you.

Continue to contribute, it's valued.

Culpepper,

"And who’s Zoros? El Zoro, the fox…"

I do not criticize or abuse you as others do, yet when you come out with remarks like this, you really do let yourself down.

You and I know exactly who I am referring to, so no need for the slimy remark.

Well done you Gadbury.

Theres a filtering medal of honour badge in the post for you.

You must now feel so strong and empowered by announcing it to anonymous folk.

Well done.

Kudos to Zoros, he called Hydro out and Hydro has been back peddling and squirming since. Making excuses for his ramping self.

"Hydro sounding more like a troll than anyone at mo tbf"

Couldn't agree more Freddie, his remarks are so dangerous, disingenuous you have to consider what side of the book he plays.

Grifters work you with a smile.

Marmaris, that is the big Q.

But many here, for some reason want to stifle this topic, why?

Hi Scaramouched,

And welcome to, One flew over the cuckoos nest.

AH01 is Danny Devito's character.

Element is Jack Nicholson.

And their are many Nurse Ratchets here too, enjoy.

Marmaris

It may well be that SD has sight of this note and nothing in it re $800 m.

We don't know, we'll find out at some point.

People shouldn't post that type of sensitive financial info without bulletproof evidence. Highly reckless and controversial.

You're not wrong Daffy.

Hi bonkers,

What gives you the confidence to say that So soon after this smash and grab?

As Colenal said yesterday.

Way to many posters here who really don't understand what they are doing and have their head up their backside.

"As always you take the negative view but actually capex spend is there to generate more revenue."

Are you truly that uninformed?

I have brought up the matter of $800 million in capital expenditures, however, there appears to be no information available to correlate it with revenue, thus I cannot provide any commentary on it, can I? I am simply requesting clarification regarding whether the $800 million is necessary, as we have not received any formal information. What aspect of this do you fail to understand? It is not an issue that can be ignored, as many here, including yourself, seem to prefer.

"No we were 25% down in Oz. It was nothing to do with the London market."

Yes, absolutely correct, it happened on ASX, but was it a result of your intel? i.e. the $800 million?

This is the issue that needs clarification.

This is no longer an issue of who posted it, the real issue is, is it fact?

And if so, it's a substantial issue that needs clarifying IMO.

Or should just close our eyes, say nothing and hope it goes away?

If there is 800m Telfer capex over 3 years, then SD is obliged to inform us, or should we not ask these difficult questions because it upsets a few on here?

Spy,

I find it a little odd that a potentially very damaging value statement on this board does not concern you.

"Give it a rest SC."

And who are you to tell me what I can or cannot post on this public free forum?

If this $800m claim is false and only on this forum, then the individual who has placed it on this board needs banning for life as it is highly libelous and extremely damaging.

If it's doing the rounds down under and did not originate on this board, then this needs to happen.

On Tues 29th we all witnessed the great Australian gold robbery on GGP, orchestrated in advance surreptitiously, just take a look at the volume that day on the ASX, no other day compares to it. How much of that robbery was down to the Macquarie note?

There appears to be considerable confusion surrounding this $800 million that's allegedly in the note too.

It is private client only, however, SD would undoubtedly have access to it. Thus, another significant question arises, is this a hatchet job as many are asserting, or is it based on fact?

The crucial question is, if it is indeed false, then why has SD not stepped forward to challenge this? Publicly clarifying the situation with the market would help alleviate shareholder concerns.

Alternatively, could this be another bomb shell to be revealed in a future RNS?

This story could be negatively impacting the share price, therefore, SD has a fiduciary responsibility to address it as soon as possible, one way or the other.

If this is a setup or a hatchet job, it requires immediate public exposure.

If SD fails to address this matter, it leaves a very unpleasant impression, suggesting that not everything is as it appears with him.

Question,

Who was the first to raise this $800 million on this board and where did you get it from?

" In 6 months the truth will out."

Agree.