Member Info for southcoastbather

Https://youtube.com/shorts/jWLvJI3sKL8?si=YTzX0X6HBRXrkjrZ

Dan the 6milliondollarman.... Complete with mask...

Amazing rise!! (from all time lows)... Cheer dannyyyy the 5milliondollarman!!

Https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-15264679/Online-fashion-retailer-featuring-500-brands-collapses-administration.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwdGRzaAN5c_FjbGNrA3lzqWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHvoEwaYalHHSbPQxi6Q75QIRpfzU5nALy034OihpdDMpJ40vT-vnuYtyr6fj_aem_O-cDNqb5XfjZ-i_NzTImGQ

Online retailers starting to fail now....

"The website has no future value to Debs because it is an asset for sale and the value will be wrapped in the sale price."

Well thats not what their official rns says is it....

One minute they're clearly acting in a concert party and own the business - which is illegal if not announced to the market but you didn't know this...

The next minute there are just strong links...

Make your mind up!!

The next minute there's just strong links

Genuinely interested to know how boohoo and the 2 founders effectively own the business when their holding percentages never changed and of course they are not a concert party?

"Bfdinvestor

Posted in: DEBS

Posts: 8,413

RE: Revaluation sale termination22 Aug 2025 10:16

Am I Hexam?

£4.6m is the approximate value of the shares sold as part of the placing minus the director purchases

Just a coincidence I assume in that case and apologies if I misunderstood your post. It's hard to follow with the amount of cr@p being posted by the trolls.

So do you disagree that Boo and the two founders now effectively own the business. Because that must be the case if I'm failing to understand what has happened here?"

"Bfdinvestor

Posted in: DEBS

Posts: 8,413

RE: Revaluation sale termination22 Aug 2025 08:02

Fed I've been saying for ages Debs are working with Minto, the other founder being involved is a surprise.

In essence, to all intents and purposes, they have purchased the business. They have just done it via equity, which is what I said would happen"

"Bfdinvestor

Posted in: DEBS

Posts: 8,413

RE: Revaluation sale termination22 Aug 2025 10:55

It will be interesting to see the shareholdings when they come out Hexam.

Debs, Minto and Alsworth agreed to buy just under 300m shares. It looks like Minto and Alsworth bought about 152m, which would leave Debs buying just under 150m.

They are clearly acting as a concert party,so in what way do the now not own the business"

-------------------

" I never claimed there was a formal concert party, simply that there are very strong links between Debs and the revb founders"

Maybe check that last sentence in the above post from yourself.

Did you know Debs wrote down the PLT website in its impairments of intangibles as having no future economic value?

Absolutely amazing.... Pay 3 million for 66 percent of your sons company... Then use funds from the group to build the business while also not giving a fair cut of the costs to the business.... Then use the groups cash to pay your son 170 million in cash plus 100 million in shares.... Then a few years later write down the website as no future economic value... You couldn't make this stuff up.

I've said it before.... The rebrand has been a car crash

How was hexam close at 250 but I was a country mile out with over 300 million when the actual loss was 349 million??

Bfdinvestor

Posted in: DEBS

Posts: 8,412

RE: RESULTS RNS LANDED26 Aug 2025 15:26

Hats off to Coasty and Hexam, who both correctly predicted a >£250M loss"

Hexam, well done, you were close, southcoast at £300m and admin guaranteed was a country mile out.

I guess he will be consoling himself with a few rum punches

Lets not forget pumping 30 million into revb and poking their nose into that company while their own company was floundering!.... Revb was in the midst of a turn around quite clearly shown by the numbers at the time....

Then having to pump more money in recently due to destroying the company to point of collapse.....

3.6 billion shares will be listed here soon enough...

Mirroring the self dilution shambles at revb....

Remember when you said the placing at revb had gained boohoo and the 2 founders control of the company?? It was quickly pointed out to you their percentages of ownership hadn't changed and there was no legal concert party anyway.

No bf I never mentioned 2020 in my comment regarding Mahmud being advised to open stores, you just picked it from my comment regarding shein, they were clearly 2 separate points. By your logic of mixing 2 comments up to suit your own pathetic agenda then Mahmud would have been advised in 2018/2019 and 2020.

The point regarding shein was because people keep blaming shein for boohoos demise, but shein has existed since 2015 as a direct competitor, so if shein is the problem how did boohoo sales boom in 2018/2019 amd 2020??.... I mean boohoo stated in their own rns and result presentations around that time that shein wasn't a problem for them!!

Regarding Mahmud being advised to open stores instead of a usdc - it was noted after covid that being a solely online retailer was quite single track, it was looking more and more like the hybrid model was the way forward.... The best of both worlds you might say....

Now if you combine them 2 points above it paints a clear picture who has knackered this company and it isn't shein.

They were still expanding for growth while the business was shrinking for gods sake!!

Building infrastructure for over 4 billion and bragging about it while the revenue was heading for 1 billion...

Takin on usdc capable of over 1 billion while revenue was heading for 200 million...

Enough staff for 3 billion while the revenue was heading for 1. 2 billion...

All while taking bonuses as the numbers apparently didn't match all the hard work being done!!

Https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1JXd9iepWr/

Reminds me of someone here.

Who said anything about 2020? I certainly didn't.

How about it was advised to open uk stores instead of usa dc.... Because that's what happened.

So shein didn't exist in 2018/2019 and 2020 when boohoo sales were booming?

The problem is not shein...

Imagine... Mahmud was advised by his advisors to consider opening shops and doing a hybrid model.... Obviously he knew better and the results are plain to see....

What a vile disgusting bully you truly are bf - complete keyboard coward warrior.

Just like t4g ironically.

Https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/first-brands-accuses-former-ceo-patrick-james-multibillion-dollar-fraud-2025-11-04/

What date do boohoo need to produce h1 results by to avoid being suspended?

For anyone listening to the justification for Dans bonus by the local boohoo brown nose, please see below.... Zero clarity on just why Dan received 2 million quid of the 5.2 million !!

His ridiculous 5.2 million remuneration was based on no performance hurdles.... Dont take if from me.... Take it from glass lewis....

Glass Lewis advised boohoo shareholders to vote against the company's executive pay plans in September 2025 due to concerns about bonus payments being made without clear performance hurdles, especially for CEO Dan Finley's £2m bonus. The firm noted that paying out bonuses regardless of company performance showed a "lack of resolve on the part of the board to put incentive awards truly at risk," which contradicts the interests of shareholders.

Reason for the recommendation: Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) advised shareholders to vote against boohoo's remuneration policy because of concerns that executive bonuses were not tied to company performance.

CEO's bonus: A specific point of concern was the £2m bonus granted to CEO Dan Finley shortly after he started his role, with Glass Lewis finding it unclear if this was based on performance.

Discretionary bonuses: The advisory group criticized the use of discretionary bonuses, stating they indicate the board is not making incentives truly "at risk".

Shareholder revolt: The advisory firms' guidance preceded a shareholder revolt where over 40% of investors voted against boohoo's remuneration policy at its Annual General Meeting (AGM).

https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2025/09/boohoo-shareholder-meeting/

Come on northern put your prediction forward for the delayed h1 results....

There's no unanswerable questions from me.... Just questions people are petrified to answer...

Where do people think this will go if revenue is srill declining in double digit figures? That will be well under 550 million revenue for h1 and losses no doubt over 100 million on that revenue

Literally can't believe his account is still active, the way he insults everyone is disgusting, every other post on any chat he posts in is just verbal abuse.

Lse really have let this one through the net.

Facts hitting a bit hard I see.

"Trolls typically make things personal, especially when presented with facts or the "truth" that challenges their position. Their primary motivation is not genuine debate or learning, but to provoke an emotional reaction, cause distress, and gain a sense of power or amusement (known as "for the lulz").

Here's how they generally react:

Ignoring or Denying Facts: Trolls are often not interested in objective truth. They will frequently ignore, deny, or twist proven facts to sustain the argument and their position.

Personal Attacks (Ad Hominem): When their "arguments" are defeated by facts, trolls often resort to personal insults, name-calling, and attacks on a person's character, appearance, or perceived weaknesses (e.g., targeting insecurities, disabilities, etc.). This shifts the focus from the topic to the individual, which is their goal.

Derailing the Conversation: The introduction of truth or a solid argument often causes the troll to try and derail the conversation entirely with off-topic comments, misinformation, or outrageously absurd statements."