RE: Commercial property market v domestic housing26 Dec 2024 11:23
"At the current time the business doesn't need cash as it has an RCF until mid 2026"
This may come as a shock you, but the current "cash" will not last us until 2026 without major restructuring - we actually have a worsened "cash" position due to the company only being offered 225 million credit facility as apposed to the original 325 rcf (although the property sale and cash raise via dilution has left us with 125 of the 225, we are 100 million lower on "cash" as a result. Meanwhile the company is still Hemorrhaging cash yearly with losses.
"Let's not forget the raise was done at a slight premium to the market price."
The raise was done at 31p, the lower end of the last 2 year price range, over the last 2 years the sp has spent more time in the mid to high 30s and even low 40s. The kamanis have taken over 500 million in cash off shareholders since ipo, and they also printed 3 percent of the company shares to give to Umer (which by your theory he sold at the highs and then bought back at the recent lows, which doesn't exactly show his belief in the company). Hardly worth getting excited when they decide to put 15 million back in and don't even buy on the open market. (the market certainly didn't get excited)
"I'm surprised Kamani didn't use Ashley's tame brokers. Then he could have bought 4% on the QT whilst the SP fell 20% as Ashley did in January this year"
I can't believe anyone is stupid enough to think that Mike Ashley has been able to control the whole stock market in order to buy shares.
Had it not been for frasers then the boohoo share price would probably have ended up under 15p - the kamanis certainly weren't going to support it were they now?! When they want shares they just do a dirty placing so as not to pump the share price up "value for all shareholders" my arssse! Name me a long term holder that still holds shares in boohoo that has made money other than someone with the last names kamani or kane?
For anyone that doesn't understand how mike has been able to to buy so many shares at 30 odd pence you just need to look at the company performance, its not magic but rather common sense!
When mike started buying the sp was in the 30s, at this point revenue was 1.7 billion and losses were 90 million
Then the following year mike was still buying in the 30s, at this point the revenue was 1.4 odd billion and losses were 160 million...
This year mike has still been buying in the 30s, revenue for this year is going to be 1.2 billion and losses potentially even bigger than 160 million...
Mike has been underwriting the share price here for a long while now - thank god he has because i dread to think where it would be if he hadn't!! (meanwhile the kamanis were taking bonuses!!! Absolutely insanity.)
Then again it's just manipulation all day every day according to you.