RE: Molopo7 Dec 2023 09:09
I think personally the experts (let's call them that, because they work in the field and we don't) have a valid reason for still wanting to drill at molopo, rather than selling off. If the geologists advised there wasn't anything worth drilling for that would compensate for the loss of the drilling, then I'm sure the BOD's would be against it. Your not going to waste more money to come out a loss. If that's the case they need to get a job in a different field and stop wasting our money and time and stop searching for empty projects.
Yes we are all worried about drill costs, but if pow is a company searching for minerals, how else do they get them out of the ground without drilling?
There's all this talk about Uranium, but we still have to drill for it. Unless it grows on trees lol and that's more cost. Same with tati and future projects.
I think the RNS is a positive rather than a negative. The company must believe there is nickel there to bring in enough to cover costs and its showing that we are moving forward
If we have any expert geologists here that see anything different in the diagram and research, let us know your expert opinions :-)