Do we need another exploration licence?29 Mar 2024 10:25
From RNS dated March 12th 2024
'The Directors anticipate applying approximately £2,000,000 of the Fundraise to the Potential Licence Acquisition Process and the Potential Buyback.'
The board's strategy is to spend a substantial amount of the fund raise on acquiring another exploration licence.
It is my belief that this strategy is wrong and I will explain why.
The board sold off non core assets to concentrate on the main asset, Zambia.
They then unexpectedly raised cash to purchase another licence in Botswana, We were told that they just couldn't say no to this asset at the price and I accepted that.
Due to the delays in progressing Zambia cash was running low. So much so that the board decide to suspend Botswana assay testing to preserve cash. Again to save cash any drilling through our 2023 winter in Botswana did not take place.
We then get the awful fund raise at 1.8p partly to buy out a Swedish institutional investor but also because cash was very low.
Anyway, having gone through this extremely painful process for retail investors we now at least have some cash.
We all hope that Anglo commit to an extensive, long lasting drilling campaign this year and find substantial copper. However, nobody knows how long this will take.
If they find one big copper deposit then, as I have said before, the only real way to buy into the JV is to buy Arc shares.
This is the dream ticket but everything takes an age. I was told the Zambian assays were sent off late December, three months later still no sign of the results.
It is my view that we should let Anglo do the work in Zambia as per the JV and the board should concentrate on Botswana, doing the exploration they had to suspend due to lack of funds.
Spending a very large chunk of cash on a new exploration licence commits Arc to spending additional cash under the terms of the licence, with little chance of a return for many many years (Zambia has shown how long it can take)
I have to ask where is the cash coming from? The annual money from the JV will pay salaries, overheads and maybe fund exploration in Botswana but not much else.
You may ask, why not write to the company outlining my concerns. Well I have done that but I just got the straight bat, basically saying this is the company strategy.
I haven't posted for a long time because the BB has become a slanging match and little else. However, I do think this is the wrong strategy when the hard work is already done in Zambia, conserve cash and wait for drilling results but at the same time progress Botswana,
I hope the next RNS is going to either give us the 2024 Zambia or Botswana drilling plan or the Zambia assay results.
Unfortunately I think it may actually be we have spent a large proportion of our cash on another exploration licence that you may see a return on sometime in the next decade.
AIMO