Member Info for Skwizz

Mr008.
Historically one of UKOG's most deluded/optimistic rampers.
Now suddenly de-ramping.
Make your own judgements on that agenda.

They're being forced to go through it again because of a legal technicality.
The same people are voting and have the same insane reasons to reject, if they want to.
The reasons were plainly wrong and the rejection left the Planning Officer and two members of the committee, incredulous (as I was).
This is not a rational process.

Survey says?

"UH URR!"

Boris,

I get this using Hargreaves, sometimes.
Try leaving a 'Pending Order', that executes a buy/sell based on your preset requested price.
(some times even this does not work - the chances lower, the more shares are being traded).

Thank you Cynders.
I may look him up and subscribe.
:)

It's odd.
Every time there's a slight rise, they're happy to try and convince everyone it's a sign the SP will rise to 10p the following week.
Beyond my comprehension but very amusing.
Particularly if you say so; at least then the hurt-feelings are amusing.
;)

The amount of grief the 'Eyes' have been given on here, for no good reason, I doubt any feel particularly motivated.

That's the way to do it.
Set a target, don't get greedy, and anything you might achieve above it is all gravey.
Much rarer to see these days, so congrat's.
:)

"Yeah Skwizz - they want to be reelected"

Yep.
The "supposed" reasoning for rejection became instantly farcical listening to the weakest of efforts to justify refusal, against clear explanations and commitment by their own planning officers.
I am hopeful this round may go better, but worry that the insane are rarely cured.
;)

Planning Officer recommended approval last time and the Chair also advised it should be approved.
Chair also advised concerns over proposed reasons for rejection he had heard (but clearly did not believe would be put forward at that time).
He advised refusal would leave the council without a leg to stand on in an appeal and subsequent court costs of £250k.
Only he and one other councillor had 'the brain' that day.
All the others showed that they had a private agenda and may do again (the delay of the Horsehill judgement will be used as their support now).

Yep, you're correct.
We could.
Or we could see 0.05p on more bad news.
Same coin.

10/10 to your post, mline.
:)

Thank you Croq', I continue to offer what limited knowledge / assistance I can to those who ask.

If you invest in small amounts, your fees will form a larger part of your cost (there is currently no 0.5% stamp on AIM shares).
Over the last three years I have invested for the longer term and traded for the short and very short-term.
I am down (about 30%) on the former method and up 10,000% on the latter.
If I had that time again I would only trade this share but hindsight has no value until two seconds after you need it.

Circumstances have changed considerably over the last two years.
I invest in £10k chunks and have only managed a handful of trades in the last twelve months.
My current holding came from my original profits and is a pure punt now.
The risk/reward ratio is not here any more, at the moment.
There would need to be a dramatic change in the philosophies behind the management of the business for that to change any time soon.

Good luck whatever you decide.
We are not here to compete against one another, only to make profit.

Depends on volatility.
If the buys and sell prices are wide the spread shows as being wide because it covers a relatively long period (15 mins or so).
While I was trading a lot I found that the "real-time" spread was actually much narrower than that displayed.
You get a 'real-time' price so can see the specific spread reflecting activity for that specific period.
:)

Priti Patel

... more's the pity!

Pointless post about a small fall, as was yesterday's ramp about a tiny, tiny rise.

Lol
It's the weekend again then.

Yep.
My BP shares are up 25% since "the news".
:)

I can't see what TH2 posts.
But I still know enough to agree with Ninetails' response.
:D