Member Info for Skwizz

Lol Primula.
Maybe our Rampers could put together a bid...
;)

Thanks, Ibug.
:)

"Document Unavailable
This document is unavailable for viewing at this time."

That's how bad things are, folks.
Somebody's referred to £36,880 as a "monster buy".

:D

"Monster buy"

The 'monster buy' was a total of £36,880.
The total of the trades you list was £45,417.32.

I'm a small-time PI and I've had more than double that in here at one time.
I left more than that in here two years ago, as a 'punt', and then had to trade it back up, in order to be able to cash out a few weeks ago without a loss, after Trousers wrecked the SP with his fund-raising schemes.

Godzilla it ain't.

Very best of luck to you.
:)

"How much they need for. Turkey drilling ?"

Had to put up £5M initial buy in and 50/50 costs with AME thereafter.
How much depends entirely on how high the sky goes.
If they turn a profit they might actually be able to self-fund it.
Otherwise expect PI's to be forking out more again soon, while Trousers enjoys another spritzer by the fire.

"It's not all bad and shrewd investors are willing to hang in."

Yeah, "shrewd" enough to hold all the way from 11p down to 0.11p, in some cases.
I was foolish, but I'd already made more than I left in here as a 'punt'.
Not feeling at all "shrewd" and have already doubled that money in just the few weeks since I sold this cowpat.

My sympathies SV82.
I've done that too, with half my investment.
It's taken me as long as it's been falling to be able to sell and get out with no loss.
Only been out for a few weeks and that money's already made more than it did over the last two years here.
GL
Wish you (and all) better days.
:)

"Got this company is crap. Ive been in this years. The losses are huge."

"Ill buy at 0.05 now"

Why?
I agree with your first.
But that disqualifies the second.

Cynders, I agree.
My personal opinion of Trousers is that he's a filing clerk, at best.

I was referring to the original poster's complaint.
He said he'd been holding for years before the 11p spike.
I wouldn't criticise LTH's because it's how most of my money is invested; I didn't trade at all until UKOG's 11p spike.
I'd bought at 3.2p, sold at 10.2p (I still remember this happening overnight, but I'm assured that I'm wrong and thus bow to better memories).
Then I started trading UKOG deliberately, as an experiment (which became ridiculously successful, and I branched out to trading other shares on the back of it).
I accept that I was very fortunate in making the decision to sell.
The price could've easily risen much higher - who was to know? I certainly didn't.
But 300% growth in just a few days... that's enough for anything in AIM, isn't it?

It may indeed have been Trousers fault the SP has crumpled ever since.
But the OP decided to keep holding, hoping for more profit.
We can blame Trousers for a lot of things, but I don't think we can blame him for when we time our decisions when to hold and when to sell.

I'm not defending him for anything else, just think that's a personal decision we each accept the risks for ourselves.
I try to be objective and impartial in my negativity.
:)

Yep.
UKOG had it's day in 2017.

As critical as I am of this company and the way it's been/being run, if you were holding shares when they went up to 11p and didn't take a profit, then you got too greedy and held on too long.
If it had gone to £1.00 you'd probably still be holding, waiting for £5.00.
Sorry it's harsh, but that ain't Trousers' fault.

Tuesday 27th July 2021

(Google is your friend).

Agree.
But he won't even be mentioned.

3cardbrag

I don't think institutional investors are even looking in this direction any more.
I'm out, but can see a [remote] possibility I could buy back in if I thought there was a chance of some volatility.
But volatility means 'up' as well as 'down', with enough of a margin to warrant the risk.
That needs some fundamental management changes.
I'm only interested in this for trading now.
I'd never buy this to hold it again.
GL with your strategy.
:)

SENMON1

Read the board.
There are plenty of opinions.
Trouble for you is that they're from both camps.
I'd be more interested in why you're invested in something lie UKOG when you have to ask the opinions of the contributors here, some of whom have smaller brains than muppets.

UKOG - News.
Nope.
Does not compute.

Also Ozzy's postings were only trying to antagonise contributors, rather than UKOG (which FOTH would've targeted).
I added to my filter list in the New Year, so haven't seen if he changed that.
Not that I really care.
From others' posts concerning him it still sounds like a waste of my time.
:)

Not so sure.
I never filtered FOTH's other guises.
I didn't think Ozzy followed that norm.
Wasn't 'he' also posting alongside some of FOTH's aliases?