Member Info for Skwizz

Wouldn't that be ironic if Salmon Slacks did it!

[rhetorical - and currently it's not possible.]

That all depends on how long LTH's will keep accepting new issues with more and more dilution.
He lost the banks and institutional investors ages ago.

Be a helluva job to take it to a more frantic and desperate level than 'normal'.
;)

"It is so much easier to criticise than to construct."

This forum has too much irony to ever get boring.
:)

https://www.sharecast.com/news/aim-bulletin/uk-oil-gas-lodges-appeal-against-surrey-county-council--7809982.html

Yup.
£1011.95 for mine because I forgot to press the damned "including fees" button.
lolol.
Only 1% so, hey ho.
Used to invest £10k chunks here but the poor management meant those tranches kept getting stuck in here for months.
The turnaround isn't quick (or often) enough to make that worthwhile any longer.

Yes, yes, yes.
I did apologise earlier.
Bullyin' SOBs.
:D

Yep.
Sold some BP first thing and just bought it back.
"Every little helps".
Of course, it hasn't affected UKOG at all.
:D

Thx.
I'm hoping that we're settling into a new range, which I estimate to be somewhere between 0.18p and 0.25p.
May not be as quick a return as some, but I'm not putting large amounts in here any more.
UKOG is just for fun now.
Most of my time is spent elsewhere and keeping the eyes in the back of my head on UKOG.

I might be tempted to put more in if I thought there was a genuine prospect here.
I do not see a possibility of that for some time, but who knows.
:)

Gotcha, Oofy.
:)

I was just watching the price fall again.
And I'm in again!
:D

As I've mentioned, I've made a lot from UKOG.
Only ever from trading it though.
The only time I tried to Hold shares, I had to spend the next two years trading the value back up so I could sell them again.
I would add that my posts during all of that time were in a similar vein.
Which I believed was fair, although generally negative and scornful of fantasist rampers.
:D

Yup.
But I did say, "that alone" referring to market confidence in the board.
That would only be historic.
Although I am still v. negative on the future, there are some opportunities that could turn this company around.
I just don't believe they're very likely, on the evidence we have been provided from our silent BoD.

Remembering that the only qualification our CEO actually does claim to have is an 'expertise' in finding oil....

The market has no confidence in the board.
That (alone) is not likely to collapse the company.
Depending on how it's done and what comes after, it could provide the business with more competent managers, and institutions and PI's with more confidence.

Just updating this link again this morning.
Now only a 40% buy, with more recommendations to sell.
All in the name of fairness and balance.
:)

Sry Cinders, my mistake.
I'm not invested atm anyway though.

While I would like nothing more than to see The Monkey ousted, I should think anyone going for an interview would not be too happy to learn that another 41% would still be required for authority to remove the incumbent first.
Then the company might have something to say about who replaces him.
Pipe dream.

Eeesh, not so good today.
Getting weaker again, according to this link.

23:55

If you make more slices of the same cake, every slice gets smaller.
A new issue (on its' own, and with no other considerations) reduces the value of all shares, new and old.
:)

Maybe Stu.
But how many of those state that all of their future operations can be financed in-house and they have no need for further placings/borrowings first?
:)