Member Info for skid35

PMason.

DL and the ENET BoD really aren't individuals you give the benefit of the doubt to, proven time after time after time with constant and very deliberate mistatements. They have reduced the cost base but is still far too large for the badly run market stall level of revenue they have. Shouldnt be listed, DL and the gang should get some local Israeli mugs to fund them

Without additional detail from an investor meet or similar difficult to see where this sits - they have clearly undated institutions in the background here through brokers who appear to be happy with the current share price.

It's clearly not a poor update as Avocet states as it is line with market expectations, needs to provide key points here backing this.

If you are a completely useless company with little to offer the market, a ceasefire is irrelevant.

Witkoff and Kushner, might as well send sooty and sweep - corrupt amateurs.

Hopefully the update this week will show underlining progress.

Savage, I hope your understanding on the markets is better than your grasp of geopolitics.

Email. A pretty ridiculous comment, he's a CEO getting a CEOs salary for whatnot be the worst performance on AIM.

Knowing how arrogant and deluded he is he will be blaming customers for not seeing his genius.

Avocet - a few more days to find out, holding my views until then.

Pmason.

Firstly, different laws apply in different countries, key here. Second, using the UK as an example you need to understand wrongful and fraudulent trading - it applies to abuse of creditors "funds" not shareholders - a completely useless CEO can continue to pay themselves $20k a month for doing SFA, become silver sponsors of conferences etc if the funds are there. Third, no that really is not the responsibility of an administrator.

ETH - be fair, these takeovers from Nvidia take time.

The FCA really should step in here with both ENET and their brokers / nomad who really are just con artists. Years of known and complete lies, all the while DL gets his $20k a month.

Really do need to look at trading prior to todays announcement.

Trying to work out to the share price with a trading statement and forward look that is slightly worse, inline, above expectations ? Also the weighting the market will put on actuals rather than the forward look ?

Still not sure on the buybacks vs debt payoff, the CFO (from his past) is a clued up individual so hope the buybacks will have a multiplier impact in time. Wouldnt mind the board sticking their hands in their pockets with sizeable (several months salary / Fees) buys after the update.

Look forward to aqr unwinding their short position, always makes me smile.

A milky way chocolate is light, doesn't mean it's going into space. My mate lives next to a premiership footballer and he's not a great sportsman.

There really isn't a use case here, this really is adding 2 and 2 and making 20,000.

Pto, yes. Took a bit of a punt here at lower levels, good timing for once, but will add as funds allow at this level.

With spare capacity hopefully income will lever down to the bottom line, the sale of the freehold was a major point in strengthening the balance sheet.

Pmason.

Completely wrong. You don't have to have a patent to be able to sell tech based on that IP, the vast majority doesnt. The business development should have been done well before the award, five months afterwards and nothing - since IPO absolutely no market interest in any post IPO products.

DL is great at RNSing corridor hellos as if they are about to sign multi $m deals,even these have dried up.

The only winner here is DL paid as if ENET had A profitable $10m turnover.

Great to see aimgambler is still unusually obsessed by me.

Pmason.

Firstly ENET IP has no commercial value, whether patent protected or not. They simply don't have anything that is competitive or game changing in the market.

Second, IP has more commercial value if patent protected. Patents contract end users, The main risk to end users is their use of IP, a supplier would indemnify this.

Third, you need to understand who the customer is, it is not end users.

Interesting to note all the recent few $ here and there is the old pre ipo tech NRE. Complete silence on anything else, as usual the merry go round of a new set of opportunities from one rns quickly forgotten and replaced with another set.

"was integrated to become part of Ethernity's existing UEP offering and is fully applicable for ASIC implementation, offering a scalable and efficient approach to high-performance routing within integrated networking platforms. In essence, this Patent significantly strengthens the Company's intellectual property portfolio, reinforcing its position as a technology leader in data processing for routing applications."

So the IP is already in their world beating UEP products for years, which have sold precisely nothing.

"Technology leader", what a joke this company is.

Utilisation of a patent ?

The vast majority of patents yield no income, with ENET this is pretty much a guarantee.

Oldsharedog.

"as the market / industry news is that ENET ARE expecting or should I say expected to receive additional contract / contracts for their semi conductor products". Outside the very small NRE carry forward on which they make no money, can you point to the market / industry news ?

Backward look, SOH and the rest of the the board really has done a very, very poor job here - great at strategising with effectively zero operational delivery on building a resilient and growing portfolio across customers / geographies and products.

Moving forward, complete lack of any real detail of the next year.