Member Info for Skelly85

Fireball you're just proving the poi t that you're not listening. Nobody is worried about what KC doesn't say, it's about what he has been saying constantly for the last 3 years and not delivered, and not explained why he hasn't delivered. I can't have a discussion with you if your not bothering to read.

I think people on this discussion aren't listening to the reasons people are disgruntled. It's not because it's all taking so long, or that people don't understand the processes involved with junior mining companies or the work involved with developing a mine. We're getting ****ed off with being told year after year that we are getting news on DFS and offtakes every few months, then nothing appears and we aren't given an explanation why. The shareholders are being treated like children and it's not very professional. If you don't have any news coming on the DFS or offtakes then keep your f%*king mouth shut about it, instead of all these broken promises.

We might get more positive news, but I doubt it will be anything significant. Samples and pilot plant won't be done until Q1 next year, and you can't get DFS without those. You're not going to get an offtake agreement from an automotive OEM within 3 months of handing them a bag of sand. So don't expect anything on that front for another year. You're also not going to get funding until the DFS is complete and permits have been signed. So don't expect anything on that for another year. We were promised all this just before last Christmas if anyone remembers.

LLInv,

I imagine most people's concerns are that we have a 10% capex reduction for a POTENTIAL process of a POTENTIAL mine that has a POTENTIAL permit, POTENTIAL environmental study, POTENTIAL DFS, POTENTIAL funding and POTENTIAL offtakers. The only thing that is certain is that we will have more promises of news on these POTENTIAL subjects, as we have done consistently for the last 3 years.

I mostly worry that announcements like this will delay the DFS, or result in a decision to produce yet another PFS. Also, the RNS explains that samples will be ready to supply to potential offtakers in Q1 2023, so I'm guessing there won't be any "INKING" for at least another 6 months?

Why don't we just sack everyone. All the staff at EMH, all the staff, at Geomet, all the staff at CEZ, the whole government, and the boss of VW. I mean what could go wrong?

Yet, still you don't have a better, long term solution.....

Yea PWhiteChurch that's exactly what you need on the cusp of making deals. A chaotic reorganisation of the leadership. Do you have any big picture thoughts for who the great new leader will be? Probably not, you just think with knee jerk, adolescent stupidity.

I'm positive on EMH fingers, but we've been hearing these "by the end of the year" stories for several years now. Gigafactories, offtakes, DFS, inkings..... what makes you actually think this one is any different than what we've been hearing for the last 4 years?

I'm not sure the local newspaper is where you look for lithium though. Who knows what's going on behind closed doors.

So you think lithium battery tech will just stop advancing from Tesla's current cell? Come on people, use your brain cells.

I don't think that's even possible. Aren't CEZ meant to get first dibs?

Sodium Ion batterys have half the energy density of conventional Lithium Ion batteries in both weight and volume terms. They also don't currently compete with the number of discharge cycles compared with Lithium batteries, so their lifecycle is shorter, which will effectively increase the lifecycle costs. They will NEVER compete with Lithium in the transport industry. Especially when solid state battery technology is cracked. The transport needs for lithium will be so great that even if Sodium took over stationary energy storage it's not going to stop the growth of lithium ion battery industry in any significant manner.
And FYI, battery storage doesnt actually provide electricity to the grid, it's just for frequency regulation and stability. Home energy storage is used for providing electricity and I don't know about you, but I'd rather have the battery that uses half the space in my garage......

EV Bull, we were expecting this over a year ago. Don't hold your breath

Mr Fox, Geomet wont be getting funding from anyone until the DFS is complete. The DFS is for battery grade lithium products, not the ore AMG want Secondly they wont be getting offtakes from people who want to produce their own battery grade lithium chemicals when they are building a plant to sell people battery grade chemicals. If there's any information to take from this factory being built by AMG, it's that it's giving EMH a competitor to compete with for selling their product to market. And someone else to compete with for EU Grant's. This isn't positive news at all

It's a good thing EMH put a realistic Tin price in the PFS calculations.

AMG are buying Ore, EMH sell refined product. What is this conversation about?

I dont see the point of this. Everyone thought it was great when EMH first listed in the states saying how lots of Americas who want to invest now can. Well it never happened. Now it's supposedly better now with new regulations that noone seemed to care about a couple of years ago? Everytime I see the RNS red dot I get excited then quickly disappointed. How many times do they have to look into new markets? Sort out the DFS.I've been waiting 5 year. I'll end up selling soon too

No you wouldn't gator. You can control this with an OTA software update.

And our PFS also shows huge profits with a significantly lower Lithium AND tin price than the market is currently at. So it's clear this mine can ride the storm anyhow.