Member Info for Skelly85

Soo, if the DFS didn't appear in 2025, out of curiosity, would this at all influence the EMH supporters and make them doubt the profitability of their investment?

Given that the DFS has been promised several times imminently since 2021, and each time hasn't been delivered, and each time we only find out through unofficial media sources, would a no show in 2025 influence their reasoning about investing in EMH?

Not bashing anyone here. Just trying to understand which, if any failure would be the one that could change an opinion.

Would definitely consider sub 5p. But only if there weren't any timelines given by emh that were supposed to come to fruition around the same time, because they wouldn't happen and the price would fall further.

Considering there's been several media articles with delayed timelines to the end of the year, there's absolutely no reason to consider this thing going up anytime soon. Macroeconomics alone can't build a mine. Its been radio silence from EMH the last several months, so nothing to suggest the media delays are wrong. Its the same pattern as the last few times we hear about delays from the media. Whether you want to call it lies or incompetence or whatever, the patterns have become very predictable here.

Promise deliveries sometime in the future, don't deliver them, go radio silent, wait for the current investors to forget or move on, promise the world to the next round of new investors. Repeat every year or two.

It will be a good buy sub 5p. No news until the end of the year and it's only going one way until then.

I wouldn't say "nothing specifically" Its more like "specifically nothing".

You might get told something specific is happening, but as we all know, from a very large number of past examples, any time the market is told something specifically is going to happen, it absolutely never does, which makes the share price move consistently in a very specific direction.

It's Gary that has issues with Sunday posters.

It's not patients that's put the share price on the floor. It's a company management that tells of progress that's coming, which never appears.

Rockstockc are shareholders so they will never have an impartial unbiased opinion. Just like yourselves who believe non shareholders are trolls and shareholders are always right.

Well, if good news ever does appear, let's hope EMH can write a RNS. Would be a shame if they just post some vague link to a news article or something like their fanboyz

Oh I can read, I justbwant to make sure you understand that this money will be for de-risked projects with things like EIA's and DFS's

Sure why don't you inform me then.

What milestones should any mining project have passed before they get funding?

Maybe something like the JTF?

Does the EU give grants to companies that can't get a DFS off the ground after 15 years since exploration started with attempts using 3 different companies contracted to do so?

Or do they generally do it for companies that maybe have Feasibility studies, permits, offtakes etc?

Tubleweeds lol, just like the progress from EMH then eh. Hahaha.

Honestly Gary, do you really think I seek or care for your approval? I'm here disagreeing with almost all of your opinions...

The only thing that's funny here is that you can't say anything that makes sense to invest in EMH, so you attack me for posting more than one in a day, and only posting on EMH, while your buddy Gruntmachine is posting all day Sunday and only ever posts on EMH. Your opinions and EMHs integrity are the only jokes here.

Gary is Spozzeneeee. He doesn't like anonymity so we can refer to him by his real name.

I don't think you should do one at all. Its Gary who doesn't like all day posters or people who only post on one board. Take it up with him.

P.S.

I wear skirts and dont wear pants.

Grenmachine,

Gary doesn't like people who post all day, or only post on EMH so you should probably do one.

"Hiding behind an anonymous avatar only posting on EMH..pull the other one."

Yea, my point exactly. Mr Sporazene's your real name then I guess...

Motive... truth? reality?

Yours? We don't know who you are or if you are a holder. The only thing we know is that you promote people buying shares in EMH for the desire of increasing demand in shares so that you can sell at a profit. No one here knows anything about each other. We don't know if you genuinely believe EMH will go anywhere with their 49% investment in Geomet or if you're just a bot of KCs keeping the shareprice afloat so he can keep getting his wages. So, enough of the BS virtue signalling and accept there will be people opening talking about EMH in whatever way they want, at whatever time they want, where they are shareholders or not. If your mind is too weak to accept that, maybe you should just stay away from PUBLIC message boards.

Sporazene,

How do you feel about Gruntmachine spending half his Sunday posting messages?

Gruntmachine, you should maybe also add the average concentration of spodumene and cinovecs mica ati you comments if you want to compare them and at least seem moderately unbiased.

It's been 10 years already.

There's no Feasibility Study, no permits to mine, no funding to mine, no offtakers to sell to, no environmental impact assessment and as a result even CEZ have said themselves NO DECISION YET TO GO FORWARD WITH MINING. The only thing thats actually real right now after 10 years is the continuation of an exploration permit and a PFS which was like 5 years ago.

It's been a fun day.

Hope's the culprit for you being in this predicament in the first place I'm afraid.

I'm here to talk about EMH and if they ever do anything that makes it look like there's progress with their one and only assess (49%), then I would gladly jump onboard. What you don't seem to realise is that why would the slouchy seating liar KC ever try to make any progress when he still gets his paychecks year after year without doing anything? If people stop investing then maybe he might pull his finger out his hole and do anything.

As for you sharealot, what will you do if I see progress and invest again? Because it seems like the only reason you appear here is to throw personal attacks at people who point out the massive flaws with investing here.

You only come here to talk about someone who doesn't do anything meaningful with their lives. Maybe it's not me who needs to do something meaningful...

Thanks for that professional assessment Sharealot. Would you like to explain how that makes my historically accurate assessments any less valid with regards to anyone potentially investing in EMH?

All good HappyLi, I don't have Trump derangement syndrome. I see his good and bad points, just like every politician before him.