Member Info for Silverlight

All this time i thought you were a holder, HeresHopin! You don't half post a lot in a suspended share you don't own! Im sure you have your reasons as your not a deramper (which is the norm!)..

Many are in here in the 7s and 8s from that sl@t drop.

Doesn't matter at what price you bought taking that level of profit is not for me, I'm in a good bit lower than the current SP (but haven't waited this long for less that 4-500% from this level. It not about jumping out here, this isn't a sinking ship, quite the opposite, its got so much value ahead of it. late 6 figures profit for me before even considering getting out.

Cut off is being extended, as per this am's RNS, and in line with the postponement of the AGM

As ive said before, no one fights for control of a bad company. In the end i want a very good ROI and at the moment thats looking better achievable, in the short term at least, by getting this trading and sticking with Bob. Then at lease, as holders, we have our own options. Other parties will be circling however and a bidding war would be even better for holders. Just need to keep Boo away from the cream for a while longer.

We know why the sp collapsed here, totally different story so no comparison. This will rerate back where it belongs in no time. Beauty market is growing and is far removed form fast fashion

To be fair most fast fashion has collapsed and it was more to do with the spike of home shopping during covid which then fell of a cliff .. plus credit crunch and people not buying clothing as appose to paying bills. That said, they aren't the sharpest tools in the box and should have prepared better for the inevitable end to covid and a market downturn.

Nothing is ever certain life, what do you expect in an rns .. he must have guidance though to state that .. he needs it relisting quickly so it undoubtable will

Read todays RNS pumpky

'The current directors are also confident that, in isolation from any adverse effects resulting from boohoo's recent disruptive actions, the suspension of trading in the Company's shares could potentially be lifted in a matter of days.'

Its not anyone pumpky .. its the CEO .. 'on the cusp' '... 'within days' mentioned 3 times .. i know hes said it before but this time is different .. he now needs it relisting .. so all of a sudden the regulators issue will be resolved.

Happy investor do you actually know anything about revb or are you just reading the propaganda from your Boo team?

1. The old revb management team has gone already.

2. You really think that boo have the best interest of all shareholders at heart, haha pull the other one.

Yes thats insider trading middle east, not a closed period. Although this rule is broken daily on AIM and nothing is ever done about it! Usually when selling before bad news, not buying.

Although other rules apply to insider trading if you know material news to the SP that the market doesn't.

Closed period is only prior to the release of accounts

You don't think 200m in revenue is worth more than 60m to the market .. hmm do a bit or research into the numbers and our peers pumpky instead of quoting one liners

Bhafcseagull - very funny.. you're not getting in cheaper, try x3 minimum

Be interesting to see how Boo respond, if at all. Their best bet, imo, would be to forgot this nonsense and stick to being a 'supportive' shareholder. They can make a packet buy holding, and adding without creating a huge mess and likely, as they have done with their current business, driving revb into the ground.

He / she is big boo holder/supporter, and not a very intelligent one at that - see boo board ...

They are much safer letting this grow and adding to their stock on the open market to create value for themselves in stock price.

Bear - i understand perfectly, been at this for decades, in admin ALL share holders lose their stock, so that includes boo. So they would immediately lose (as it stands) 15m in stock. They would then have to make an offer for the company assets, along with any other potential suitors, they wouldn't have first dibs, thats not how it works - the independent administrators have to take the best offer for any assets - and that might not be form boo - so its a big risk for them to force that situation.