Member Info for Silverlight

Yes, no legal precedence for them not to be able to vote. Only way would be that they have agree not to for whatever reason - which is up to them.

When did they say he couldn't vote?

he has shares he can vote

Bought more, even though average 13p. its at least 50% lower than it should be.

They would be stupid to pursue Minto after the boo stunt, best thing would be to let it go for his vote.

On its way back up

Markets down across the board, its not revb related.

Can always buy with an all share offer, just issue new shares in boo. Or a mixture of cash/shares which is pretty normal. I don’t want anymore boo shares though!

Maybe boo had keys for the other one ..

Change of registered office .. probably nothing in this, but you never know ...

Depends whats boos offer to him might be. They may say they will take his stock off him off-market for a big premium for example.

Yes the free float will be getting smaller and smaller now, i recon its only around10-20% if you take into account all the big holders and sticky PIs. Low free float plus increasing demand means the price only goes one way...

Yes I believe the same, but then we have to ask ourselves what is boos strategy. Why are they obsessed with taking Bob and the rest of the team out the game, he was in place when they issued the ‘supportive shareholders’ RNS. They have a plan and you can bet it isn’t to get full value for revb PI’s

And then effectively take the assets in a fire sale from the administrators. Tall story I know but anything is possible with these cretins.

Oculus

It’s not about changing the board members, it’s that (and if you believe him) Bob suggested that with boo in control the banks would pull the facility which is what boo want so they can cause it it go into technical admin. Personally I think that’s scaremongering , but that’s what’s the concern is as it was in black and white in an RNS.

Hosai - yes, the director buying suggest they are confident of winning a vote - they may have something up their sleeve to ensure this or they might just be buying as much stock as they can for a month to ensure they have enough votes between themselves and whichever additional larger holders them can get onside. (Noting they haven't said anything about the Minto legal action since the initial rns ... hmm i wonder why!)

In terms of boo they have 4 options:

1. Sell there stock for a 8-10m profit as current price. (unlikely).

2. Buy more and be forced into making an offer (unlikely as they don't want to pay fair value, they want to take the company for peanuts via a forced admin situation).

3. Continue to hold (and be a 'supportive share holder' hahaha)

4. Take their current proposed route, and force/vote management out, stick their own team in and force the banks to call in debts and try and salvage the company out of a fake admin situation (very risky, unethical and a difficult thing to pull of to get all moving parts to align so they actually make money via this strategy in the long term, especially if half of revbs customers decide to walk).

If i were boo id go down route 3 and make a nice 100-150m profit by holding and supporting the business for a couple of years. They wont though cos they are a set of t@ats!!

And the business is stronger now than when it was over a quid! its not even a tech stock ..

Pushing now, 34 to buy

Everyone on here needs to make sure they vote in bobs favour, contact your broker if you done get a voting notification on your account.

A tr1 that boo are selling would do more for the sp than all these director buys oddly enough, under these circumstances.