RE: Latest news3 Mar 2018 10:48
On the question of why the Czechs had denounced EMH a Memorandum of Understanding, MIT spokeswoman �těp�nek Filipov� referred to Tom� H�ner's (on behalf of YES) resignation of the Minister in the resignation of Tom� H�ner. He, among other things, said he wanted to end the misinterpretation and speculation that took place around the memorandum.
who has misinterpretated the MOU? it non binding .
H�ner said on Thursday he wanted to find a two-sided solution that would close the entire lithium memorandum case. "Unfortunately, EMH did not, despite the promised promise, take adequate steps to resolve the situation," he said. "My patience is not endless, EMH has not responded within the set deadline, so I decided to proceed to the only possible step, declaring the memorandum invalid," he added.
and this is the bit that I feel is face saving for the Czech Gov or Babis which ever way you want to look at that,
I see that as THEY have declared the MOU invalid its ALL they can do. and are seen to be doing by the Czech people, but Laws take president , but this election football was over MOU specificly or Austrailian stealing thier Lithium ? wiggle room for a better deal for the Czech people which we all knew would be the case so it is business as usual politicle phaffing will calm down and WE can get on with things.