Member Info for Shouston

"the directors who have not been compensated at all for their work in 2023."

Sorry but did their "work" deserve any compensation....

Come on own up. Who leaked the letters!!!!

Anyone wish to take ownership of this?

Where did all the money go...

Since the change in management and Board in August 2009, the Company’s operations have been financed through issues

of equity.

Net proceeds obtained from a private placement in May 2010, a public offering in December 2010, public

offerings in July and August 2013, the April 2014 Offer, the August 2014 Offer, the July 2015 Placing, the First Tranche

Offering, the Second Tranche Offering, the Issued 2016 First Tranche Offering Warrant Shares and the Issued 2016 Second

Tranche Offering Warrant Shares, the June 2017 Placing, October 2017 Placing, the August 2018 Placing and the 2018

Director Placing, the June 2019 Placing, September 2019 Placing, 2 July 2020 Placing, Subsequent July 2020 Private

Placement and Initial Atomic Placing and related debt exchange arrangements as stipulated in the June 2020 Prospectus,

the December 2021 Placing, the April 2022 Placing, the July 2022 Placing and the Winter Bond Financing amounted in

aggregate to approximately $257 million.

Taken from Prospectus

Some bargain hunters doing well...?

What a saddo you are!!!

I am now beginning to pity you.

You need help.

NNTR

Edit.

A) COPL do have a major asset? Worth fighting dirty for.

Thanks for the reply. (Maybe I need to take it with a pinch of salt...)

Agree very destructive activity. Is it as binary as:-

A) COPL do have a major asset?

Or

B) COPL has nothing more than a difficult field to monetise?

Do your sources reveal if all of the monies promised by AV actually materialised. I am perplexed by the two recent destructive RNA.

■ JV stopped

■ Got no cash and we stopped injecting

Still interested in a reply. BB.

So far the only thread today not stained by Coplover's verbal ejaculations...

"P.s. The wider market may not be aware at this stage but the JV partner had OIP figures under COPLs land at a much higher level than the Ryder Scott report confirmed"

Sounds interesting, and may explain the reasons for such a ruthless 'sabotage' on sentiment recently.

Both yourself and mal mention this mention this point this evening.

Can you shed anymore light into this ?

· Araguaia is a high grade, low cost, long life asset located south of the Carajas Mining District, north east Brazil. The feasibility study disclosed in the Araguaia Technical Report demonstrates robust economics with the Stage 1 process plant producing 14,000 tonnes of nickel per year and generating a Post-tax IRR of 28.1%; Post-tax NPV(8%) of US$740 million; a Payback Period of approximately 3 years; and Net Cashflow of US$2.582bn, based on a market consensus nickel price of US$16,800 per tonne (see the Araguaia Technical Report) and in each case based upon the various assumptions set out in the Araguaia Technical.

Spot price today is $16,012

https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/nickel-price

Would the simplest, and least dilutive solution, not be for the 100% off take partner "Glencore" to secure a lower than market price for a set number of years.

They could lend the monies to complete the mine, and then enjoy lower pricing when the mine is in production.

GLA

"There was a plethora of activity at the company offices this morning,"

Just curious as to how you would know this point BV?

But no doubt still being paid a kings ransom.

Is that reply recent Roxi?

It implies that he is no longer working at COPL?

These earlier trades also look like buys given the price at the time...

09:24:22 18.00 200,000 36.00k price at time 17.75

09:15:49 17.95 277,127 49.74k price at the time 17.75

If these buys keep coming them should be another positive day...

10:17:30 18.50 125,000 23.13k

Tramadol,

Stay calm mate...its a free world right?

Do I trash the share after I sold...No!

That is my Gut feeling Mr D.

However, as always with COPL, nothing is straight forward.

Will keep my eye on this...

They only sold 45m out of 306m.

Still retaining 19.4% of the company.

This is quite interesting...

This is also my personal belief that Glencore will get slightly better prices when mine is in production in return for a loan to complete this massive mine. ($429M has already been spent on the project. It ain't stopping imho)

As you point out Glencore is our one and only customer who is more than happy to take all of the expected 29000 ton per year.

Let's see what transpires...

Looks like another strong day here.

Nice rebound from this mornings lows.