Taken private - doubt it26 Mar 2017 23:30
If this were going private it would have been done a long time ago at around 5p. Complications with local investors originally reversed in at 60p kept it floated in my view. Instead the CEO converted a shed load of debt at cheap price to bring down his in price from 60p. Also, he's never failed before and has done this a few times with other companies so I read. The plan now seems to be to raise money from institutional investors so it needs to be kept public to do this. The whole idea behind the merger is to use the larger market cap to attract institutional money. That makes it safer for all of us. I think they may have gone slow to get the final conversion done at 10p but also if they did a 90 day flow test then they had to sell all the oil at 10 dollars is my understanding. Now it's around 16 dollars so a bit better. However, the bigger prize is now maximising reserves to get the longer more favourable licence term (Clive mentioned this in podcast) now that private investors on the Baverstock side no longer have to fund the drilling. I think we will see a flurry of news soon, followed by a fund raising and then a much more aggressive drilling campaign to achieve this. Let's hope so. Anyone confused about the value upside should read the two research notes published on the company website. They aren't massively extensive but do provide and interesting backdrop on the value proposition and where the upside lies. The shallows themselves are a winner that the market seems to have overlooked. Enjoyable bedtime reading! :)