Member Info for share4

Revenue of the sector is irrelevant, not all games are going to have natural advertising space, works well on sports ( like football, F1 games) where there are billboards in game but the vast majority of games will not have such advertising space and inserting it will not be possible due to the risk of disenfrachising the gamers.

Moreover the effects of the advertising space is not understood yet, as it is in online, outdoor, TV, and selling that to advertisers on a larger scale is not going to be particularly easy

Interesting proposition but has a long way to go and there is little discussion here about the real challenges

You didn't answer the question, who are the big boys in THIS space who are doing what albert do?

BIDS is clearly getting ramped on that board. not a single well reasoned post on there, mostly about how much money fortnite has made which is completely irrelevant, or how big the industry is... which is completely irrelevant. Perhaps this is fueling the share price, markets are irrational after all.

Not saying it's not a bad proposition but I like to see reasoning rather than hot air

Gaming is a bigger industry than music and films? So what? They're not making games are they.

Oh, really, who are the big boys in this space, and what share of the market do they have?

Here's another point for you to take on board. A companies marketing department has brought in Albert to optimise it's campaign distribution. It is agnostic to where it advertises and shows a high level of ROI, staff have to be trained to use it properly, and it becomes an incumbent so therefore nobody wants to spend the time replacing it when it's doing the job well.

Now consider an in game advertising platform that reaches a certain demographic for a certain cost, you think that's difficult to get rid of when it starts ruffling the feathers of companies worth hundreds of billions when people only care about the CPA?

It's not after many years, it's after a short period of pivoting actually, since they pivoted to a SAAS model they've taken on an impressive list of blue chip clients, the important thing being the revenue is recurring and the products ROI is compelling for the customers. In one instance the client has even become a partner they believed in it so much.

Albert is already competing I'm not sure what isn't clear about that from the client list.

Bidstack has a small number of contracts with some game suppliers, these however, will have to renewed on a game by game basis, they are at POC stage competing against Facebook, Google, Youtube for market share, those are some big companies to go up against. Furthermore they've raised significantly less than Albert.

I would say that tripling revenue is rapid expansion, I'm not sure what other measure you want, that is very good for a SAAS product at this stage of development.

The cash burn is a concern, and it is a punt, but it is one that I am happy to take.

Not sure why you think their model is more viable though, all it would take is someone to get up in arms about advertising to kids through games and that business is dead

Would rather take a punt on an agnostic AI platform serving blue chip clients , recognises by the industry as disruptive, and expanding rapidly

Not sure why it's strange as I've never posted here much only to tell you to DYOR

I'm still a holder, thanks for the tip

I'm certainly not doubting your ability to pick stocks that multibag, OMI was a good one too.

hope you all win, was looking at putting some money here but I saw a post from eyeguy about it flying after a jda and from past experience of this forum that makes me very wary of going anywhere near it.

Can't buy for less than 0.187Looks to me like there's a moderate seller and big buyer around

so sell up then, I personally don't want to see you make any money out of this anyway

(following the $3.3 million non-refundable deposit already received by the Company).

That's £2.56 million paid already. Market cap sub £5m, insanity.

Sorry, miscommunicated - cash will be more than new market cap after deal

Deal goes through cash will be more than current market cap? Anyone care to verify

almost no downside and seemingly crazy upside

This is a slam dunk lol

I'll add you to my fan club then tony, ta ta for now

lol, the guy who says i should get a slap around the ear then goes on to call me an aggressive idiot, priceless....

tony, you're quite possibly one of the most ridiculous posters I've come across on here lol