Member Info for share4

Also dude one only has to have a quick glance at your posting history to see where you're coming from. Predicting VAL would go bust while PYC would hit a market cap of 50 million back in 2019. Great stuff.

haaa ok then do you have a medical background on the time it takes for medical devices to come to market
---

pyc is a consultancy, not a company creating medical devices. jesus.

well both amazon and google have gone up 2-3x over the last 4 years, want to pick some others?
the market cap of val at the current moment is less than 20m is it not?
you didn't mention a clear cut product that will grow the company, what is it?
I'm sure I haven't mentioned a lot of things just as you haven't mentioned the 13% decrease in revenue this year
I don't actually own any oil companies, but I did own this below 2p and sold out some way above that price if I recall correctly and it hasn't done much since then

Lets get some alternative facts

PYC

• Loss after taxation increased 235% in FY 2021
• Income (revenue and grant income) decreased 13% in FY 2021
• Lower market cap than 4 years ago
• 6% future revenue on projects from a company valued at less than £20m not likely to be worth much
• No clear cut product or growth strategy

Spoon fed? Look, go onto any forum and you'll find people doing back of the fag packet calculations on future revenue and profit projections on which to base valutions. On this company, as below there's never any numbers attached to anything. It's actually not a particularly terrible company it's just that only on here people present it as a growth stock when it isn't.

Small consultancy adds something to another companies product to test with some users translates on here into "tech will save millions" and "on the verge of signing a revenue generating deal?" with no numbers. Also doesn't appear to recognise that the company that is on the verge of signing this moneyspinner with PYC thinks so poorly of the product it wants to sell it.

Hot air and jam tommorrow as has been the case here for several years.

Yes you couldn't give a straight answer to this as I thought. All hot air and potential. As for Riddler, filtered me when I pointed out DMTR was hot air at 2p, now 0.2p.

Do explain that further. Who is the company on the verge of signing a revenue generating deal with for how much and how long?

here's what I posted in June 20:
valuation is not just as simple as how much cash has it got and what's the burn. the most important thing is how the spend is transferring into recurring revenue.

why is it "very very positive" that they don't need a raise for a couple of years? This company is one in which you should never talk about raises at all, it's a consultancy funded by its clients not a tech selling a single product recurring revenues. it does limited timespan projects which pay for staff, administration and sales, then hopefully you would make a profit. there is hardly much growth here, so what to value this on? the worst possible thing you can value a company on is potential without numbers behind it and the fact that it works with "big names", it's all smoke and mirrors. Where is the increasing revenue coming from in this company? Supposedly it's been coming for 3 years, where is it?

ob yes I disagree. if the tech added clear value to the bottom line of its clients it would be reflected in the revenue by now. 20% revenue growth for an early stage tech is pretty underwhelming to say the least. I'm not sure why people are saying the tech is great and has potential.

Lol you're not the only one

got these around 2.6 last week, can now sell at over 3...

This isn't 10k worth of stock here, go onto almost any AIM board you'll see people complaining about the "mystery seller" driving down the price any time a positive RNS is made, where do you think they come from?

You are so naive, the point is to sell into an RNS. Someone else who has seen this first hand has also pointed out that this goes on all time. What is is the board have done to earn this faith that people blindly have in them?

toptuf,
if they flog these at 30p they'll have made some serious money, just think about that for a second.

The BOD were supposed to deliver a Jorc on Plateau within a reasonable timeframe, that's what they did. What else did they promise?

well actually every day has been groundhog day for this one for a long time, full of promise and no ambition

This is the same goldstein that has been going after simigons directors for their appointment and renumeration, i have no idea what the intent is.

Goldstein popping up again doing god knows what