RE: The Lancet31 Mar 2021 16:26
@Prion25: Yes, it's obviously the same paper that you discussed on Saturday. Sorry I missed that, but pleased to see that richlist reached a similar conclusion to mine, i.e. those with a worse outcome were showing higher IFNb mRNA, i.e. a higher INTENTION of generating IFNb rather than success in actually doing so. Assuming we're right, then of course that puts a much more positive slant on it.
I'll resurrect the Saturday thread in my next post, for anyone wanting to follow it back.