Member Info for SFH300

"DH is personally stumping up the money"

Because no one else will. And he's jettisoned yet another pledge - "no more dilution".

Also, Ian Bagnell will be livid.

Exactly. Some will say this represents DH's commitment to and faith in the project. Others will see it is another failure, of both the "no more dilution" idea (which he reiterated earlier this month in an interview with Sarah Lowther).

As does the SP.

RNS

"SFH What is your problem ??"

No problem. As I've said before, I don't begrudge you your optimism. I'm just astonished that someone who constantly predicts the future for this stock mocks another for also predicting the future of this stock (" ... so pleased you have crystal balls and may see into the future").

"Better so pleased you have crystal balls and may see into the future."

...says person who constantly posts "shorts doomed to failure". Unbelievable.

"Badlands please don't be a sad loser.."

Stupid comment. Badlands is lucky to be just 20% down. I'm 85% down. Thus, I'm currently enduring a great loss and it makes me very sad.

I don't begrudge you your optimism, but some (eg, me and Badlands) are suffering badly out here and don't appreciate your mockery.

That'll be why the SP is down 2.7% then.

I see investors are falling over themselves to buy into PALM after all the talking up on X, here, etc.

PALM is listed on the main LSE. It's not an AIM stock.

A year seems a rather optimistically short time for this to become a ten-bagger. If the markets aren't moving swiftly at this stage, there has to be a reason. Most likely some concern about the bitcoin treasury strategy.

"Yer sure about that, as I'm nearly 8% down already."

If you're not more than 75% down yet, you're still in clover! :D

I take your point, but one of those bloody vans nearly took me and my bike out on a "quiet" country lane last weekend! I didn't report him in case, as a highly influential investor, my complaint caused the SP to plummet.

:-D

Being late to the party will have been a benefit for you. Those of us who got in very early are still very much in need of scuba tanks.

A minimum can't be a range. In your example, the minimum would be £3.

"Ok mate! stick your head under the self checkout cameras and leave it there. lets see how much it conforms to CE standards."

A stupid argument. Almost everyone has an x-ray occasionally with no deleterious consequences. Medical professionals who experience frequent exposure to to them (ie, many times per day), however, require protection or need to take avoiding action (leaving the scanner room, etc). An occasional glass of wine or beer will have no effect on long-term health, while frequent high alcohol consumption will lead inevitably to anatomical breakdown and eventually death.

For goodness' sake, ditch the Trumpian lack of perspective.

I believed in the company four years ago, but now I'm 80% under water I'm not so sure.

I don't think anyone's going to be ordering anything from Ocado just before leaving the country.

He's not the only one frustrated with the SP malaise. Still can't shake off the feeling we're being conned.

"Hammering up" would be £2.30 in my case.

JP2000, just last week you replied (in the RNS thread) to a concern I raised about what's going on with:

"A couple of days ago Nick O'Reilly (Chair) moved shares into an ISA & now DH has added new shares. What's not to like from either of these moves!!!"

So, if you think I'm a mug you're partially responsible for making me one. Please don't bother me with your imbecilic unpleasantness and inconsistency again.

Bye now.