RE: Crystal Amber AGM22 Nov 2021 22:20
There are 2 types of funds - 'evergreen' ie meant to carry on forever, and 'non-evergreen' ie those wherein shareholders can periodically, as set down in fund's articles, vote to monetize assets, remit those funds to shareholders, and restructure or wind up the fund. CA are not an evergreen fund.
The rational being that sale of assets can often realise more than a fund's shareprice. It's a bit like breaking a car up for parts and selling them - the car may be worth £3K, if broken up and sold as parts, it it worth £4K. Funds when 'wound up' in such circumstances, after disbursing funds back to shareholders, often restart under new name with many previous shareholders reinvesting money into the new fund
Saba invested in 25% of CA specifically for that reason only circa 12 months ago - to force an asset sale which would bring them huge profit ie. more than shareholding is worth.
So it is by no means for HUR SHs a bad thing that Saba are currently forcing 'restructure'. It may indeed be that after the sale of 2-3 of CA share assets (at significant profit), Saba may back off and agree CA to continue
One thing is for sure - CA's task now is to increase value of asset SPs as much and as rapidly as possible, to achieve the best poss price in marketplace. There will be no rush. To that end, it may be a good things for HUR SHs looking for SP increase and monetization sooner rather than later - if CA can knock HUR into shape via tax situation, AM extension and other aspects discussed before - and attract a bigger fish industry buyer. Hence CA's prognosis of SP being multibagger from today's level.
I interpret today's SP lowering as usual knee-jerk reaction and would expect fairly rapid rebound.
So, as well as more than usual moving parts, we have another HUGE moving part just chucked into the mix.
Views gentlemen please, views....