RE: Valuation8 Apr 2026 17:47
Thank you Neversellshell. I always enjoy your contributions. Tokuawa there will be some hedging for 2027 already but it will not have much of an impact. If we use your figures and the present metrics that would be $800m (the company's figure) + (3 x $170m) + (4 x $150) = $1.9bn. However, there are four factors that will help for 2027. First, the proportion coming from no tax US (the 23% is not payable because the entire purchase price is deductible!) should have risen. If we produce 45k barrels a day this year it should be 56.25k next year with no change to opex. So that would be $328.5m extra (11.25 x $80 x365). Second capex overall should fall in 2027. Third the interest bill should fall as debt is retired. Fourth we will have a full year's contribution from low tax Waldorf. I am not sure what the natural decline will be from Norway and the UK which will have an adverse impact. But using you assumptions you can get to more than $2bn. I personally would say that you should not really assume $80 brent because the forward curve is not much above $70 and $15 for gas is also a bit higher than the curve. But if $2billion is the figure 75% or $1.5bn should be paid to shareholders in one form or another because we will already be below a ratio of 1 (debt to EBITDA)