RE: LCG13 Jun 2017 19:53
So that's a no then, you have no evidence to support your theory of suspected poor results, just speculation based on "delayed" results.
Because the final results have not been issued at around the same time this year as to previous years does not make them delayed. Unless the company has specifically said they have been delayed? Have they? I must of missed that RNS if so....
Whether the results are good or bad they have to be released under AIM rules, so them being issued later than previous years doesn't tell us anything as to if they will be promising or not.
A couple of weeks back there was huge volume of buying for the anticipated results, since then there hasn't been much selling. The odd couple of £1k here and there as PI get bored yes of course. However the overwhelming majority still have positions. Some of those positions are very substantial.
Please show me where the share price has tanked? From 3.5p to 2.5p? Even though the smallest of buy or sell volumes moves this either way. I believe it even jumped to 4.6p back in the middle of May one morning on open.
It's simple really. I've got quite a chunk in here and believe based on previous RNS's the future here looks promising. I'm not looking for bags off the RNS but believe with the right results 4-5p is possible, however with such limited free float it's anyone's guess how high it could go.
You on the other hand have admitted attempting to short this stock so de-ramping it would benefit you, even though as you've proven in your reply, you have nothing of substance to support your claims.