RE: Location of step out well9 Jan 2025 16:53
Problem is that a lot of the pure play helium companies (looking for primary helium not associated with natural gas) have not panned out. A lot of people on AIM know the sad story of Helium One. Other examples of failed primary helium plays on other exchanges include Noble Helium, Royal Helium, Desert Mountain. So there is good reason to be careful. But Pulsar Helium may be different. The team is very experienced - Thomas actually was co-founder of Helium One and helped advance the understanding of primary helium systems. In part due to collaboration with the Noble Gas Group at Oxford. He left Helium One before the carnage to shareholders, in part because of political instability there, since greatly improved. The Topaz project in Minnesota has many advantages. 14% helium is mind blowing. And it is dry gas underneath a perfect impermeable seal. It seems to be a large reservoir, and the gas has flowed to surface at commercial rates, though no huge volumes yet. (about $23 million of helium a year while they likely need 5-10 times that much to finance processing plant). However they are still trying to prove they have a globally important resource. If they do, and advance to commercial sales, this will be a big winner. And will be important for the northern region of the state. The deepening of Jetsream 1 and the drilling of a step out well are VERY important, are fully funded, are happening right now, and could possible greatly increase the resource estimate. Pulsar is high risk but high reward. And the results of current drilling could derisk the shares significantly and tilt Pulsar Helium into an asymmetric position where reward begins to outbalance risk in a major way.