Member Info for Sausageonstick

I'm not sure the Board is obsessed by Quint and Jasper per se, but more about what they post on here.

To post what Jasper put on here on Monday evening, is either a lie or insider information. I guess the FCA will come to their conclusions if they investigate and contacted Roland / Briana to see if any information on RNSs was handed out prior to its official release to the market.

Clemenson

It's called research. Maybe you should do some on ROQ.

DaP

Lol, if only that was true.

Is anyone in the SYN Telegram group? I'm not, but just wondered what stuff is being said in it.

So Jasper posted on Monday 20th March 2023 at 18:38 under the title of Sorry

"Sorry I've not been able to control the board or narrative today. Personal reasons.
Got to love the conspiracies though. :-)
RNS this week I'm told....."

It's either a lie or a insider trading, both of which may be deemed market abuse. Don't take my word for it, read the message at the bottom of this very webpage

"Important Message from the Financial Conduct Authority
Posting inside information that is not public knowledge, or information that is false or misleading, may constitute market abuse. This could lead to an unlimited fine and up to seven years in prison. If you have any information, concerns or queries about market abuse click here."

So the message that Jasper wrote, was it "information that is not public knowledge, or information that is false or misleading, may constitute market abuse" I guess the FCA will decide, if they speak to Roland and/or Briana at Synergia.

asimpleinvestor

That isn't removing your own posts, that requesting your own posts are removed.

The individual who removes the post is employed by LSE to remove them, I'll say it again you cannot remove your own posts, I'll add, you can only request that your own posts are removed.

....are LSE as they own the 'system' and mediate what appears on their system.

So who removed it, would be LSE, the questions is why? and that is fairly obvious when you read what Jasper wrote. It's either insider information or a big fat lie. Maybe Jasper reported his own post to get it removed as no one wants a screen shot of themselves disclosing insider information which could easily be sent to Synergia or the FCA.

Watermelõn, I can always tell when I getting near the truth.

The struck off dentist aspect, for me, is a red herring. It's irrelevant. If the governing body of your profession think you are so sh 1 t they strike you off, then you need a new career.

My concern is Ajan background in pharma, which I'm getting a feeling people don't want to discuss so focus on the struck of dentist aspect.

To me, your response has a feeling of sweeping it under the carpet.

I'm sure you are encouraging people to fully research companies they may wish to buy into, aren't you?

I'm only doing research in ROQ and asking questions, was you would do with any share you want to invest in. So not sure why you would bring up Edenville and SYN.

I'm sure you did research into ECO, 88E, AMC, VAL, MSYS, AA, UPL, BOIL or ROQ, didn't you?

Many thanks for popping your LSE clemenson cherry with a post for me. A question, if you are a member of the Twitterarti promoting this, which one?

Thank you for highlighting that the CEO would happily ring me back, as I build up my research into ROQ I may request a chat.

So when you say "article was written by someone very much apposed to stem cell research on religious grounds"
Which article?? How do you know they opposed stem cell research on religious ground? Is it written somewhere? Could you provide a link please? Or are you simply trying to claim they opposed stem cell research on religious grounds to deflect? Just be honest, is it your personal opinion of fact?

So if the author of some article yet to be identified was opposed to stem cell research on religious grounds, could you tell me if the authors of the following articles were also opposed to stem cell research on religious grounds when they wrote their articles?

https://forbetterscience .com/2019/07/15/questionable-activities-of-uk-company-celixir-by-patricia-murray/
https://forbetterscience.com/2019/04/04/sir-martin-and-ajan-the-stem-cell-gold-diggers/
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/business-news/struck-off-dentists-companies-funding-2025569
https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/7822615.dentist-struck-off-for-blunders/
https://the-eye.wales/doctor-at-large/

Surely they can't all be anti stem cell? Can they? I've certainly heard Ajan talk about anti stem cell people on Stockbox interview.

If you could let me know what due diligence ROQ undertook on Ajan I will add it to my research. To note, according to the Roquefort website the following are members of the Board (https://www.roquefortplc.com/board%20of%20directors)
Ajan Reginald
Dr Darrin Disley
Professor Sir Martin Evans
Stephen West
Jean Duvall
Dr Simon Sinclair
Dr Michael Stein

For Celixir (https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10541091/officers) it lists 13 officers / 8 resignations, so the remaining 5 are
Ajan Reginald (mentioned twice)
Dr Darrin Disley
Professor Sir Martin Evans
HURVITZ, Chaim

I would there therefore be really interested as to what due diligence Dr Darrin Disley and Professor Sir Martin Evans did on Ajan, who they worked with at Celixir before they made him CEO of ROQ. Think I may know the answer.

I wonder what due diligence they did of Ajan at Novacyt as, according to Ajan's LinkedIn page he was only there 1 year 1 month full time.

Looks like a few buys going through today. I wonder how long it take for the TR-1s to turn up as large shareholders potentially dispose of their shares?

Maybe I should post everyday if it goes up when I post - lol.

In the long run we are all dead, so when you say 'at some point' it kinda leaves it open.

Like we could say

I'm expecting a(n) (...................) RNS at some point. Insert your own

So from the 9th Feb RNS, (and please feel free to use this as a template for your next RNS)

Discussions regarding the previously announced sale of 1,500 tonnes per month of fines remain ongoing. - So what are the results of that discussion?

The subsequent production of washed coal is expected to be reduced for as long as the rains continue - Have the rains finished and production ramped up?

The Company is also investigating the costings and lead time for an additional wash plant at Rukwa, - what is the result of these investigations?

the Company continues to explore further opportunities in the Tanzanian coal market as they are presented. - So what is the result of exploring opportunities?

Edenville is advised that the courts in Tanzania will address at a hearing in February 2023 - and still they sit silent with the results of the court case???!!!????

£180,000, to be recouped following an earlier aborted acquisition process. - Have they got our money back yet, the silence suggests no.

6th Dec 2022 RNS

While the tendering process for the appointment of a contract miner is ongoing, - Surely they must have selected a company by now?

Read Fiona O'Leary's view on Ajan Reginald

https://twitter.com/fascinatorfun/status/1484634637246861319

The internet is just littered with articles on Ajan Reginald, Celixir, Greece trials, but I've never seen ROQ or Ajan offer a defence against the articles. Has anyone? Unless someone can post a link to an article where ROQ / Ajan respond?

If it was shut, then a 100% improvement on nothing is still nothing (100 X 0 = 0)

Just saying to keep the board factual. Lol.

Set of 5 tweets that bring together Ajan Reginald's work.

https://twitter.com/Aim_Eudaimonia/status/1638195199540166657

0.2p next month or 2, predicted by Zak Mir

.