Nasirul
"Expect some further activity soon on this."
Is that what you sincerely think ... or is it merely a whooshfool hope of yours?
Over the last year several posters have said that Hasina HAS to make a positive decision on Phulbari as her re-election depends on it. Well there has been absolutely nothing in the Bungla press which raises any hope in my mind that that is going to happen anytime soon.
And if there isn't a positive decision on Phulbari before the election, she then has another four years of procrastination to play with regardless of how desperately the country needs the power which Phulbari can provided.
I have more chance of turning Ayres Rock into a chocolate muffin than we have of getting Phulbari's SoD approved before the end of this year.
I'm still holding purely on the 1,000-1 chance that it happens.
FILLETTED!!
As opposed to filtered!
What a ....! let the reader fill in the dots.
Thanks Noloss.
Why can't they stick to the same format for releasing their news I don't know?
To me that's a little sloppy!
cowboysteve
Looking at AMC's page on news,
http://amurminerals.com/category/news/
there was an RNS on 20th June announcing the "Conversion of Loan and Issue of Equity" and no mention of "Director's Dealings".
The following RNS on the 27th was the "Final Results for year ended 31st December 2017".
Where do you see the "Directors' Dealings" announcement on the 21st June?
... there wasn't a June announcement about the mandatory Directors' monthly £625 each share purchases last month.
There was on 20th April for 108,000 share @ 4.55p each
and on 22nd May for 87,894 @ 5.6p each.
The two above were announced with the heading "Directors' Dealings".
I thought all directors' dealings had to be reported?
Noloss,
I also remember the 1m trade at 14.26 being at 4.30p.
Only 7 trades, the last one at 15.16 for 25,000 at 4.29p.
Tadska
There are no trades showing after 15.16 on Nexexchange, the last being for 1m so I don't know where you see that 1m trade at 15.19
there was a good reason for releasing the RNS so late in the day?
Why wasn't released at 7am this morning?
... administrative costs, for the current financial year - if we last that long - will increase by £60,000?
.. manipulation just look at what the 'da boyz' in NY have done to the silver price today. I can't see any reason why it should have dropped so far and fast. Let's hope they don't do that to the same degree to nickel as well.
In 1999 I helped to develop a new website selling a mass market insurance product. Before we went 'live' it was tested to destruction for about three months using people with advanced computer skills and some with virtually none. The point was to try unearth the glitches that all profiles of computer users would intentionally find either by design or error. Many things that the designers had not thought of were then built into the program. Only minor glitches discovered after going live. Pity that ii didn't do the proper user acceptance testing first. I think that they have thrown and 'unready' product out there and are using its customers to do the user acceptance testing as a cheap alternative to using their own expensive in-house techies to do it. I hope they lose loads of their customers because they don't deserve any loyalty after this fiasco. The CEO should be removed NOW!
I don't expect the PFS before the directors have each bought their pre-arranged �625 monthly share quota.
Thanks JoeBass for that link. Interesting and informative. I notice the date of that breakdown of the Tesla S model components is Mar 2016. I wonder how much the technology has advanced since then and how much the current Tesla S model has changed and will change in the near future.
trickyroman, why don't you post that garbage on the AMC board and see how you get verbally dissected like a well cooked chicken? Or are you too chicken? "nothing has happened"!? Idiot!
Bullfrog80 Were you away from school the day they taught the class how and when to do paragraphs? Reading a block of copy like that is too much of a chore. Haven't bothered. I'll stick with posts that have 1 - 5 line paragraphs.
Nothing new. A repeat of his "right product, right location, right time" presentation. I doubt it will do anything for the share price tomorrow, unless there is other good news RNS'd.
The text was in an e-mail I received from Future Money Trends, pushing a stock called New Energy Metals. The reason for posting this is not to endorse FMT's recommendation, but because it has some thought provoking facts about the future sales of EVs We�ve Barely Scratched the Surface for Green Energy Stocks! Dear Reader, Few realize just how small the electric vehicle market is today. The potential for its growth cannot be understated. There�s trillions in global government subsidies and real demand from millennial consumers. China, who had virtually no electric vehicles (EVs) three years ago, accounted for 50% of sales last year! Next year, China will actually force automakers to earn credits by selling EVs or purchasing them from competitors. U.S. automakers are projecting that EVs will account for over 50% of Chinese sales by 2025. These vehicles, as well as their sister hybrid ones, with gas and electric, saw a 154% increase in Chinese sales just in the last 3 months! In the U.S., we sold about 200,000 of these vehicles for all of 2017. In China, they sold 143,000 in the past 90 days. We are seeing irreversible trends, which is why we believe speculators who think it�s too late for lithium and cobalt are not fully appreciating the demand side of the picture. To put it simply, demand for these metals is skyrocketing! ***China and India are both going to 100% electric vehicles. ***France has promised to end the sales of gasoline vehicles by 2040. ***1/3rd of cars in Norway are already EVs. ***Volvo has promised to phase out internal combustion engines starting in 2019. They�ll all either be EVs or hybrids. For cobalt, the largest corporations on the planet are all scrambling for ethical supplies that are critical to companies like Apple and Ford. For lithium, the available supply barely covered last year�s demand, and for all this talk about new supply coming on, the bears fail to truly see the demand side, as well as the inevitable supply disruptions that regularly come with mining, especially for any new potential supply being factored in. The opportunity in front of us is enormous, and it will last for decades." This type of talk only serves to strengthen the rationale for us having our own smelter.
Vertigo thanks very much for that illuminating post. With regard to the downside of using a toll smelter, I get the impression the company's thinking is vearing more towards having our own smelter as the income from copper, cobalt and other PGMs will cover the extra capital costs very quickly and deliver much large profits from year 3 onwards. The prices of nickel and cobalt will ultimately set the agenda moving forward in whatever guise.
TDT, sadly I agree with you. But it is good to know. If Vertigo has an idle moment on his hands, I would be interested in his opinion on these figures.