RE: RP in Middle East for discussions on a deal24 Nov 2022 13:52
I think its easier just to wait for any formal RNS and then analyse, because that is the only certainty on what the company are doing/have achieved.
My view is that the poor SP performance has nothing to do with the companies strategy to get these products to market. Everything they said they would do, they have done. The company has, to an outsider looking in, failed in the funding that they agreed to get momentum on the strategy. However, we don't know whether at the time this was a better option than placing. If agreement had come sooner for the GSX then we could've seen significantly lower dilution as the conversion and selling would've been at a much higher price. Hindsight tells us that they should've placed. Unfortunately, we can't go back in time and we have to call out that it was a mistake by the board. I'm still confident that VLRM will deliver on what they said they would, but it may take a bit longer to get there. Q1 should see alot of activity and revenue generation, which is always handy when looking at future funding or general company valuation. I think Q2 is when we start to see development of the expanded GSX as a digital trading platform. NFT Marketplace will need more clarity on funding and plan in general. Next News guess from me
Q4 - ME expansion funding deal
Q1 - Juno Deal
Q1 - GSX Deal
Q1 -NFT funding
Q1 - ME expansion deals
Q1- GSX conversion Plan
San