Member Info for Salinger

“ For goodness sake QFI need an urgency dept.”

QFI have zero control over when samples are sent to them, that’s Greenfield's decision, is that so hard to grasp?

No, our interest in oil sands is purely with Greenfield.

QFI have no commercial interest in these companies. As far as I recall they have been written off/down to zero, can’t recall exactly the detail but they are history and not relevant to current QFI business.

Why would you think there was news about QCC?

Nice idea Kurly but it’s not your life and you know it.

Porky pies Kurly, you’re not an investor in QFI, many things but not an investor.

“Some one needs to tell me when was the last time we had a positive RNS”

What’s this “we” business Kurly? Did you you buy in recently?

Usually get my info by reading and listening, you?

Indeed indigo, I was waiting for and expecting it, just giving a little rope to assist.

To that I would add, so what if it takes 12 to 15 months to complete the LONO/s? The crucial point is they happen and will undoubtedly succeed in proving itself as a better and more desirable fuel to be burning in 2021, and hopefully helps develop biomsar at the same time.

The aim is to then use Quadrise fuel in a significant proportion of the MSC fleet which, if agreed, would transform the company and its fortunes.
In these circumstances 12 months is nothing.

The QFI share price has jumped and slumped many times over the years, I’m well used to it Helpless, I have no problem other than those who continually mislead investors with their bull.

“West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil is a specific grade of crude oil and one of the main three benchmarks in oil pricing, along with Brent and Dubai Crude. WTI is known as a light sweet oil because it contains around 0.34% sulfur, making it "sweet," and has a low density (specific gravity), making it "light."

The key point above is low density, ie it can pump easily and flow through pipelines and onto tankers. Utah bitumen is high density and cannot, it’s that simple. What Utah bitumen has in its favour is low sulphur.

The WTI standard is clear, to be priced against this benchmark you first have to meet its basic description. Low sulphur and low density, any deviation from that norm incurs a price penalty, Utah has one but not the other. The reason PQE were paid the WTI price is because they dilute the bitumen with solvents to make it less dense and the refinery concerned needs bitumen for the roads.

Take whatever time you need Helpless, it will not change the facts.

Not at all Hughie, but what I do know is the company I invest in and I do know who you are and what your motives are.
You have nothing to offer other than negative BS, you’re problem not mine.

Why are you asking us Shug? Maybe try the IMO, they might respond.

Wow, is this meant to add to the discussion? Try quoting from the PQE website, that would be accurate. Yahoo and their ilk offer a light touch summary of what some people want investors to focus on. PQE website confirms its “bitumen tar” for example.

Can’t think why Helpful and others choose not to mention that fact? Anyone seen bitumen at room temperature? It’s almost solid, beyond being able to pour, so how exactly does it get into the tanker and into the refinery other than being heated?

Solvents is the answer. Also, refineries will only accept oil at WTI standard. Raw Utah bitumen does not meet that standard which is why the solvent is added to comply.

I’m afraid helpful is much less than his handle suggests. Why would that be do you think?
Stick with facts and you make better investments imo.

Instantexpert. I’m afraid you’re handle over eggs your pudding.

It’s a container vessel, one of the largest types at that, and will burn msar 24/7 across the he Atlantic and back.

If you’re unsure just ask, there are many long term holders here who are not desperate tampers etc. We ha e the info and are happy to pass on.

As for who advised? Management and experience and knowledge of our company. 6 months from LONO start and it’s done.

However, the MMU is stored in “Spain” so work out where that might be?
Six months max to reinstall and produce fuel, pretty good only book.

lol Hughie, think I will pass on that nonsense.

Helpful. Ive never promoted QFI to anyone, simply state the facts. It’s entirely up to Greenfield if they use MSAR and I’m certain that will be determined on economic grounds.

You have ignored the facts or don’t know what they are. The bitumen delivered to the refinery will be processed by a non-complex refinery specialising in bitumen products and spread onto the roads of Utah this summer, that’s your current market.

I also think Greenfield will be profitable without QFI given current oil prices, but investors will want more than that if they’re to stump up $185m for a new plant. They need maximum profits which, again, is why Steve Byle came calling.

As another poster would say...nah.

“ The solvent is not added to the output post production so it can be transported”

Therein lies the problem. Holders here seem to not understand the history of PQE. The product is bitumen whatever you claim, George Stapleton believes so, that’s fine for me. Large amounts of extra solvent most definitely are required to pump and deliver the oil, that also is a fact and why Steve Byle first contacted QFI as the cost of transport to refinery was prohibitive.
It’s all out there, you just have to look.