Member Info for RuckRover

Ray,

I really AM depressed at the SP!

Still could be worse, at least I don't support Burnley.
Hang on, I support Birmingham.

Now I really AM depressed.

Some interesting tips on how to spot ramping on that site:

"Look out for long posts trying to wow you with knowledge - Repeat copy and paste types."

C7, caught ramping VAL lol.

Tommy, interesting.
SCLP 11 places higher than VAL as most ramped share lol.
Inanaco one of the top rampers with no shares lol

-2p ?

C7, thanks for the response. What we have to remember is that everyone is entitled to act as they see fit. The actions may be different to our own but they should be respected. Similarly, everyone has the right to feel how they feel. If a post makes you angry, you have the right to be angry. It may not make me feel angry and I might think it shouldn’t make you angry but if it does well it does. I think by its very nature, arguing positives has to be more tangible because it is what HAS happened rather than what might happen or HASNT happened (but could yet happen).

Thanks for the article crumbs, very good.

Morning C7, All,

Thanks for the assessment on the four horsemen, it was quite a revelation! The people you name I personally find very knowledgeable, respectful, polite and with a sense of humour. As holders, it is not unsurprising that they are positive and enthusiastic. That enthusiasm can on occasion be seen as ramping, it really depends on who’s doing the seeing.

I didn’t see much wrong with Knowlesi’s original post (although it did deteriorate rapidly from then on!). The situation described is pretty much as it is, you, I and crumbs have all said something similar over the past few weeks.

The only thing I do take exception to is being told how I should FEEL just because I am an investor (long term in my case) or the converse, if I’m not Uber-positive I should sell up and clear off.

Let’s hope for all our sakes that we get some positive updates sooner they we might fear. I bit of hope accompanied by a bit of blue would be very welcome. Hope everyone has a great rest of the weekend.

Yes I did see your post, interesting.
C7, your right, you'd know a lot more about surviving than me!
Of course prevention and early diagnosis would mean a lesser need for treatment and therefore fewer side effects.

C7, thanks for the thoughts, best wishes to your friends as well.

We've had this conversation before I know, but the fight against cancer has the following components in order of importance:

1) Prevention
2) Diagnosis (the earlier the better, accurate)
3) Identification of best treatment (maybe part of diagnosis)
4) Treatment/Cure

I came across a test called Oncofocus from a company called oncologica. Anyone heard of it or got any views?

…. SP languishing, IND not approved, No trials in progress, news black out re SCIB2/CRUK etc.

So what happens? We have a nice little discussion about semantics and trivialise complex, life-changing clinical trials by likening them to a Car MOT test!

"deadline" is not the best language C7 ....

Yes, technically correct, target date might be more accurate. A deadline is something that MUST happen for something else to occur. When I was implementing banking systems where there were a lot of complex interdependencies, we called them "drop-dead dates". If any team missed their drop-dead date, then access to the entire system could be threatened.

In this context however, the missing of a "target date" will doubtless be looked on unfavourably by the "market" with a negative effect on the SP. Then of course, there are patients who could benefit from the drugs for whom any delay is literally a "drop-dead" date.

Forgive the grumpy post, my niece's best friend has just come out of surgery for colorectal cancer. She is in her 30s with three small children.

This cancer type is one of Scancell's future targets I believe.

Da, it would make sense to keep a few. When it hits £8 their problems will be over.

I wouldn't mind being a slave for £400k per week!

Ray, you can be very cruel!

I believe there are syndicates that own players, remember the Tevez and Mascherano saga?

C7,
Who says? It may not be financially wise to dump a load of shares. If they go into administration it will be up to the administrators to decide what happens. The best course will probably be a transfer of portfolios to another fund manager.

The optimism was founded.
Let's hope the bounce isn't of the departed feline variety.

“Realistic”!

Morning C7/TF/All,

Yes, not a good day yesterday but a bit overdone imo. The only bad news is the absence of good news!
Until trials start and data is published, the SP could go anywhere (up or down). My stance is to be patient and not worry about day to day movements. There isn’t anything else I could do at this juncture. GLA.

crumbs,

>>“The pessimistic Investor " sounds a great title lol<<

A bit of an oxymoron really. If you were pessimistic surely you wouldn't invest? You only invest because you hope to get a return, so by definition you are optimistic. The only options would be "optimistic" and "overly optimistic"

Thanks C7.
If you can't be honest about yourself what hope is there! :)

“The pessimistic Investor (Ruck)”

I don’t consider myself pessimistic at all, quite the reverse in fact. There is plenty to be optimistic about as far as Scancell is concerned.

Perhaps a better word would be “realistic”