Member Info for RuckRover

Bono,
I’m afraid you are mistaking healthy and balanced debate with “self indulgent arguing”

Ray, thanks for the clarification.
So according to the strict definition, I have been buying continually.

You would perhaps be able to fund a continually buying strategy by continually selling?

The other myth I’d like to debunk is the accusation that the slightest criticism of the bod is a “negative”. This has been levelled at me and others numerous times.

I think in light of a dire share price performance, commenting that the PR/IR may not quite be up to standard is decidedly more positive than other possible reasons.

Inan,
You claim...
“ what i don't do is speculate on what scancell is doing .”

But this is EXACTLY what you ARE doing in your 9:43 SPECULATING that Scancell are working normally spaced 2 metres apart.
My office can only accommodate 25% of the normal workforce in order to maintain social distancing. I can SPECULATE that this will have an impact on progress. You can SPECULATE that it won’t.
The point is, Scancell are not telling us and most of us think they SHOULD, whether legally obliged or not.

Inan,
“what is the Odds that Scancell staff never catch Covid .... ?”
About the same as anyone I would think.
What ARE the odds you learn English?

Morning all,
Bermuda - nice measured and balanced post.

Inan,
Further to our discussion a few days ago, it now seems that not only are you happy with zero tangible progress on the medical and financial front but now you appear to be happy to be kept completely in the dark indefinitely?
What sort of investor are you?

Your 9:43 post I can make absolutely no sense of. You have no idea as to the working arrangements at Scancell. You also seem to have confused the viruses that Scancell work with in the course of their scientific research with viruses they may pick up from family and going to work on the bus/train.
Are you seriously saying that because they deal with the immune system, they have some sort of super-immunity themselves?
How do you account for consultants, doctors, nurses and even the chief medical officer getting Covid?
Unintelligible ramblings.

Bunsie,
My insinuation was that there are lots of disgruntled shareholders around!
No way of knowing how many, but a pure guess, no more than 20 with holdings in the 200k to 2m share range - 10-20m tops?
Most I suspect will hold on for a better price than 6p though! If you offered me 20p Now I’d consider it .

Do you live in the cotswolds? I used to live in the woods around broadway tower.

Ray,
It was 42 of course, but who’s going to pay me consultancy fee to come up with that?

Wtp,

Just finished:

NEVER!

“ When i'll become a gajillionaire from Scancell - can it predict that? :)”
Wtp,
Yes it can. I just need to log on to the supercomputer and make a couple of adjustments to the algorithm.
I’ll get back to you as soon as I can, it will take about 10 minutes - I’m afraid it’s only running at 500 mega flops. (Million floating point operations per second)

Wtp,
Yes technical analysis works better on the blue chip companies although even with these events such as the Covid crisis wouldn’t be foreseen.

No I’m afraid the software has been developed for the company I work for. To make it more widely available would cause issues in terms of IP and support.
What was it you wanted to forecast?

Wtp,
I develop forecasting software for a living. There are many things than can be predicted (with various degrees of accuracy) but I’m afraid the SCLP share price isn’t one of them - using charts anyway. The SP is totally driven by news and, in the absence of news, sentiment.

Dick,
No I think it was market relief that you don’t hold many!

I don’t think anyone doubts that money will be found.
The question is when and at what price?
To state the b******* obvious, the lower the price, the greater the dilution.

Bunsie,
Morning. If you are trying to buy out all the disgruntled holders it may turn out expensive!

Inan,
“ Ruck ... if its common sense why are you not buying ....”
I did preface my post with “if”. It was a big IF as well, I capitalised it in the hope you would notice.

Crumbs good point.
What are the chances of these being closed before we need another cash raise?

“so its now basic maths ............ if you feel the science is good enough, how many are you prepared to hold because trying to buy after you have the data is not the same as buying before ...“

So what you are saying is..
IF the science is great and leads to great products and leads to great data and then great deals, the SP will rise? And if you buy before the price rises, you will make more money?
That’s not maths, that’s common sense.

Inan,
Interesting comment from you...

“ What Scancell have said they prefer to do deals after trials not before, obvious reasons, its the most easiest point to start putting value to what you have created because you have "efficacy" data and "safety data"

so ........ not sure how marketing can be improved and IMHO closing deals in this scenario is not about personalities its about Data”

It’s what I’ve been banging on about the last two days isn’t it?

Do you think there will be progress on the much needed trials during the Covid crisis or is everything on hold until it’s sorted?
Are you hopeful on some news on Covidity in the next few weeks?