RE: Brilliant19 Sep 2020 21:19
Evening Bunsie,
I have the same question as Bermuda, what would you class as day trading garbage. I totally agree that it is fantastic we have such knowledgeable people as far as the underlying science is concerned. It would be wrong, in my opinion, to think that this is all that matters as far as Scancell, its investors and prospects are concerned.
We may have the “best” science in the world, but this in itself is no guarantee that it will translate to approved products or that even if approved they will be the commercial success that we hope.
This is a risky investment and many things can go wrong, not just the science. This is a long journey and there will be many obstacles along the way, some we will not have envisaged.
There may be some here that are day traders. I don’t even know what that means. I have had a large sum invested here for eight years and I only want success for Scancell, not just for financial gain but for the benefit of those suffering from melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and others. As C7 said yesterday, we need to put things in perspective.
I, along with a growing number, aren’t afraid to discuss any aspect of Scancell, good bad or indifferent. I would class Bermuda and Burble amongst that number although it may be inappropriate for me to speak for them (or they may want to distance themselves from me!)
So genuinely, if you think there are topics that legitimately come under the heading “day traders garbage” I would be glad to hear them. I can guarantee you an impartial consideration and honest feedback.