Member Info for Roulette

Myo....your last sentence....like it.

No leaks?.....your joking....and the rise Thursday/ Friday? City boys making money again.

Perhaps it could be better described as ‘take and pay, or don’t take and still pay’.

However, not sure how enforceable it would be.

R

Prevo....she wants it built. Just hedging her bets. If she gets control, she’ll build it. That’s what Scotman is referring to, I believe?

R

Goaty....also, just in case you missed it, see Scotman’s 13.40

Why don’t you have a go at him.

R

Cheshy babe.....

.....’arrogant twonk’.....

.....not sweet in any of my recipes....

.....gosh.....I’m turning into you.....aaarrggghhh!

.....all the best, Lotty ;-)

Resigned to name calling eh now goaty? You have not, and will not, get any respect that way.

Lotty.....lol....’arrogant twonk’.....PMSL.

Goaty.....you getting it now?

Both 12.01’s.

Goats.....It’s hurts for me to have to explain....but the 12.01 post should help you a tad.

R

Goats....sorry to bother you. Now where did I leave my rose tinted glasses.....

Such an important change should have been the subject of an RNS, not encapsulated within a 400 page document........imho.

That said, is this latest twist Gina publicly demonstrating ultimate confidence in the project.....or could it be a little sinister perhaps?

Hi paaa. The 25th October 2016 RNS states, with no mention of Stage 2 :-
The Royalty Financing Agreement is conditional upon the Company completing its Stage 1 financing (taking into consideration amounts received under the Royalty Financing Agreement) and two confirmatory due diligence items which will be satisfied prior to the Stage 1 financing being finalised.   Â
Once completed, drawdown of funds under the Royalty Financing Agreement is conditional on, inter alia, notice having been given to Hancock that the Company has expended US$630 million of the total amount of its stage 1 financing; creation of the royalty interest including the granting of certain obligations and arrangements to secure such obligations in favour of Hancock, to ensure that the Royalty attaches to certain assets which comprise the Project; all material permits, commercial arrangements and authorisations for the Project remaining in place; and other drawdown conditions typical for an agreement of this nature.

I’m either missing something, or the inference that it is dependant upon Stage 2 in the Prospectus is an additional condition. One which was not stated in the 2016 RNS. If ‘inter alia’ was intended to mean ‘subject to Stage 2 being completed’, why the heck didn’t it say that?

R

“Isn’t the salient point from this RNS that Hancock never had to commit a penny to this project until they were satisfied that funding was secured to enable Sirius to produce 13mmtpa”

Morning paaa....I think it was your good self that posted that about a week ago to a question that I posted. I had always thought the condition was related to the co. having spent a certain amount of money on the project. Where are you seeing your above condition?

R

I’m not scared Andy. I’m a long term holder. No trading for me.

R

It’s shown as a buy on here.

‘Must try lots harder’

Note to yourself......’must try harder’

You forgot to put the sign up rekrab......

“GONE FISHING”

I was at my bank today; there was a short line.
There was just one lady in front of me, an Asian lady who was
trying to exchange yen for dollars.
It was obvious she was a little irritated ... . She asked the
teller, "Why it change? Yesterday, I get two hunat dolla fo yen.
Today I only get hunat eighty? Why it change?"
The teller shrugged his shoulders and said, "Fluctuations."

Taken aback for only a second, The Asian lady says,
"Fluc you white people too"

**we must be over the worst now. share price steady today**

Yep, and another steady day today. Can’t think why though.