Member Info for RomanWolf

If I felt so strongly about this board I wouldn't post at all lol. Enjoy your shower. I'm sure we all look forward to the next time you feel you have to roll in the dirt lol

Low volume doesn't always mean a SP declines

Chuggley do you have a better understanding than PB. I gathered from your posts today you don't seem to have an understanding any clearer than the rest of us?

I know for sure that 18k has been drilled which I didn't know for sure before. Credit where credit is due.

Last week was the last update. They let you know they had drilled 18k metres but as yet were still unsure why they were drilling and what the results of the drilling were.

Did get a picture of a rock in a hand taken on a Nokia 7650 and a dirt road left to guess where it goes. It gets the creative juices flowing at least as to what it could all mean or not mean

And so it begins, minimal posts on a Monday morning can only mean one thing. Definitely nothing this week.

Daz,

Not sure of how successful the Twitter ramping is on a SP. As far as I can tell it's the same 7 people, sharing each others posts, liking and commenting on each others posts.

I can't see any correlation to those "ramps" with SP movement.

So in short the "at least one RNS" will be the company accounts.

In his defence he didn't specify a positive re-rate.

Happy Birthday SK. I hope you asked for some more reliable sources

Unless they plan on putting massive storage systems in a car or a drill then no. A push for this mineral may curve the lithium price but would only then make the Vanadium price more volatile. It's unlikely the lithium price will continue to rise and rise regardless but it's certainly going to be a highly lucrative mineral either way

As a shareholder Im rooting for that RNS that actually says that and/or it does achieve your expectations in the timescale you believe but as yet I haven't seen GR hit one even slightly close to what you have thought or he has eluded to so for me every week that goes by is another week longer before a mini large mine starts making Q1 2023 even more unrealistic.

I don't think that's right Snowking. I think if there was an RNS stating that it would be a different picture. I think balance is needed and that those posts tone down your interpretations of ignoring every evasive and non committal word in an RNS.

Personally I don't think they are negative views just more pessimistic than yours

Anyone got any ideas on when Bernie might give us an update on something, anything?

So upgrading the price by the same multiple that's 25 million then

Snowking,

Every month you say will be a good month, this is the month, re rate, blah blah of course over time I hope that finally you are right. The same way I hope that finally we get an RNS which isn't littered with the favourite words of PREM.

"fairly concrete"

Snowking,

I think I'm pretty adept at reading between the lines. The point is I shouldn't have to read between the lines. You are interpreting it as a given already and that is not the case. If it was they would have been able to state it. It's another non committal RNS.

When they can confirm what your saying in an RNS then I'll consider it to be fact. NOMAD haven't seen anything that confirms what you are saying hence why they haven't been allowed to put it in an RNS.

It is simply another RNS widely open to interpretation which is clear from all the tweets, BB posts and telegram chatter.

It would be nice to have something concrete for once that isn't open to interpretation

Snowking, the RNS does not commit to any of what you just posted. It implies it. In fact the only definitive is the confirmation in there they have dropped 18k metres and that they have not agreed anything

Oh yeah last time was 3 months ago.

I'm in the telegram group, can't say I've seen you mentioned Daz