Member Info for rogerDSH

beinthelead
A civil, factual reply to a straightforward question would have been good !

I was wondering, whether there has been any recent comment from Myles?
I have seen nothing but may well have missed.

Sakura
Please advise, how the news that he has squandered 10 years of his life, in the development of an ineffective theraputic,
may best be broken, to the country's leadind immunolgical pharmacologist and world expert in respiratory medicine.
The blow will be all yhe harder, since he is under the delusion that, whilst generally virus agnostic, it does have particular value in addressing the covid mode of attack.

Does anyone know whether
Myles has updated anywhere with his current thinking re Avacta ?

I'v already suggested purpose several times. If my belief is correct, then the problem is likely to become worse.

LiamBooth
Two things to remember...
• Med3000 effectively performed well agaist oral viagra
• Everyone knows..if prospective partner or huge investor is going to put big money in...they will get hold of a sample first and try it informally...Why wouldn't they?

DrNielson
I recommend a look at direct competition at phase 3 and as I've said before, consider whether the most likely or least unlikely explanation is ...doing anything he can to slow things down, now if possible and also trying to muddy the waters for launch.

Hantatty
There is not the slightest chance that he is 'naive' and being 'wrong' is not relevant in his conserations.
He only has one aim...maximum damage with a serious purpose.

As I've said several times before...if we want a probable reason for LB's huge investment of time...look at competition coming up on Phase3 and consider potential benefits of our med being slowed down a little on launching...DYR

It seems to me that there are clear indications that LB has a serious purpose.
I believe that his relentless onslaughts represent a strategic denigration of our med, in support of a competitor's product expected to arrive in the market at the same time eg a topical Sildenafil: DYOR DYR

Re latest (topical Sildenafil)
post from Lbo.....Has He EffectivelyJust Told Us What,'s Going On ???

OR..is it just me jumping to unjustified conclusions ?

Re your first post referencing Flexseq...Thank you for inadvertently highlighting the fact that Med Device appro enables FUM to make detailed claims for efficacy on product leaflets.
However, you have not addressed the question of the essentially misleading nature of your post or other questions raised.
We are all awaiting replies...are we to receive any?

Lbo
Re your last post...'concept of MED2002 being a Viagra type gel'
I did not think that Viagra was available as a gel viagra....am I misinformed or are you misinformed?

Lbo
What about the gross innacuracy of your last post...are you just going tp ignore it ?...do you expect us (meaning evryone but you) to ignore it ?
Can you really believe after what you have just done that you have any credibility at all.
Give yourself some rest and peace man.

Yes Italian, a most distinct podiatric misadventure...he will find it more difficult to present himself as genuine now. I'm very happy

Absolutely...nothing grey and fuzzy about this one...caught 'bang to rights' I believe is th expression

Hi 81
That was exactly my feeling !

I think if med device approval allows one to speak in such glowing terms and detail of one's product, then FUM could find themseves limited by obscenity laws , rather than med restrictions !

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/948159/synairgen-phase-ii-data-points-to-potential-of-its-drug-in-severe-covid-948159.htmlClearly presented, in disassociation from the miasma of today's disaster, the main findings look quite encouraging !

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/revealed-home-
cure-covid-could-available-year/

Do we feel the Pfizer pill is a serious threat to SNG ?