Member Info for riptonk

It's a public company.

1. It's not a private company
2. It's certified as effective.
3. You don't need to ignore WHO advice because their advice (as posted) says categorically that a generic non alcoholic sanitiser will not protect you. Byotrol is categorically not generic and WILL protect you and is certified as such.

If you don't think non alcohol based products are effective then fine. If you think Byotrol is not effective then say so please.

Byotrol is effective - fact. Preferable - opinion. I have never said it is the only product or non EU companies need to comply with standards.
If you don't think it is effective or is incorrectly certified then say so. You said I was strange in concluding it was but that was flirting with words. Go ahead and say something definite.

Thanks for the reply.

1. Private company?
2. EN 14476?

Completely flummoxed as to why you are here now.

Hopefully the shortage of hygiene products at this time is enabling management to prioritise supplies to buyers who offer long term contracts. Whilst this may or may not be a short term opportunity, it may well lead to a sea change attitude and greater appreciation of how vulnerable schools, gyms, transport systems etc are to rapid transfer of bacteria.

Also:

Sanitiser applied frequently would be alcohol free preferably unless you are a wrinkly old shrimp and don't care. Since this particular virus is highly contagious and surface based then the need to reapply would be a prime requirement.

Also:

If you have any information that questions the European Standard EN 14476 certification then that would be very interesting for you to post.

Stt1,

I'm not sure I understand your point now, hence I thanked you earlier. You have raised the points addressed by Byotrol and linked to earlier by oneandonly1 at 05.32.

https://byotrolplc.com/why-your-hand-sanitiser-may-not-protect-you-from-coronavirus/

"Whilst the World Health Organisation (WHO) advises the public to use an alcohol-based hand rub, the average antibacterial hand gel found in local supermarkets, pharmacies or airports may not be effective against viruses. Consumers should therefore check before purchase that any hand sanitiser has specific efficacy against enveloped viruses to make sure that they are well protected.

What to look for;

Is the product labelled as ‘cleansing hand gel’? Cosmetic hand gels which don’t make any antibacterial claims are formulated to clean and leave hands fragranced, but not kill germs
Check for specific claims of ‘antiviral’ as an antibacterial hand sanitiser will not necessarily be effective against viruses even if it kills bacteria
Select a product which openly states that it has been tested to EN 14476, the European standard test which evaluates the antiviral efficacy of biocidal products – some hand foam sanitisers state efficacy against viruses without meeting the requirements of this test
The Boots antiviral hand foam, powered by Byotrol technology, has been tested to European Standard EN 14476 against Vaccinia virus, which is considered the benchmark enveloped virus and is therefore considered effective against all enveloped viruses including strains of Coronavirus in 30 seconds."

Unique product in protecting you without the alcohol element. Good point stt1. Not just any old sanitizer.

An hour ago. Read the tweets below - definite demand here.
https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1230907665846611973?s=19

There are hardly any cases outside China because hardly anyone has been tested. This is why NCYT took another leg up because medical statisticians are calling for sizeable sample testing to reveal how many we will likely have. Note I have never held NCYT unfortunately. Telegraph reporting WHO as saying the average infection per case is another 2.6 people. Super spreaders reaching over 14.

With respect: those dates are from a time when corona virus did not exist. Today, we have a sizeable portion of the world's shipping fleet going around in circles off the Chinese coast.

If this ###### ######g seller doesn't #### ### soon I'm going to burst a #######g blood vessel!

Ripping now at 10475. Need an hourly close above 10420.

I've been told I'm wrong before by uber rampers but time and RNSs proved my calculator right. Couldn't care less what people think.
I think at 10k BTC Arb is adding just over 0.2p to SP per week. The longer this goes on the better our investment is. We should be adding at least 1p per month and yet we have lagged on that for some time. The SP is too low anyway and we are building on it all the time.
I think an rns saying 10% of BTC being held back would be good with me.

Every hour and day at these BTC prices is building up the coffers and removing the risk. It will all take care of itself sooner or later. Of course newcomers will have avoided all the previous high risk periods and will be joining the party now with little to lose. Tad frustrating but this is life.

First time looking in for a while - Phoebus still using the pronoun 'we'.

Alex - it must be so frustrating trying to save people from the share they are locked into day in, day out. They don't even believe you are a shareholder! You are clearly at your computer so put that screenshot of your holding on the bb. That will show them! And then all your words and advice will make #### all difference anyhow. But I would like you to show them.

I've added substantially this morning and will keep it now. Divis and buybacks doesn't do it for me. Knowing the cash position will put a line under the SP. It will tell the market what the risk is. A cash position of $10m would get people sitting comfortably with a downside limit and an upside to the moon. IMO. Hopefully at end of Q1.

Tsbs - apol.