Member Info for RIDER75

Thanks prof.

I heard about PAT at GRZ board

If no pump nothing wrong with sharing ideas to search on.

The markets are not efficient

In these low liquidity nieche space even less.

An updated claim rewrite the math to some extent. And claims in the billions make the headlines. Perhaps many potential investors will only meet with our story first time in such occasion.

So I expext it will move us.

Wonder how other cases success or failure affect our sp. At least temporarily.

First I think you have the right to post anything you want. And you are right we have to tool to block your posts, but the answers of others will be there still (as this will be read by many. I promise I try not to answer anymore....). Its a fact that this board a year ago was one of the rare exceptions with its constructive, insightful informative friendly style.

It is still I think. Just there is a level how an argument or discussion fits into this.

I wish all the best for you, and have succesful trading. Really, honestly.

Kat have you ever heard of the phrase: random walk?

Not exactly, but the sp moves at this stage is something like that.

It may be 54 47 55 42 58 45p without any meaningful reason. Whats more 36 or 60 p.

You are fixed to this risk idea and comparison to those started to invest from 10p. They are rare. I was lucky enough to start around there but have other buy levels later. The risk is the same as yours as I have a portfolio, and that portflio has a value today. And I hava a choice to make in every moment to sell or not to sell .

I do have the same risk as others who buy today. The concept that future risk depends on your average level is just mental but not true. Mental as you regard the level of unrealized profit as a risk buffer, but probably who buys today also had that profit just realized and probably from another stock/trade

What I really cant understand: if you have such level of doubt and risk aversion, why do you spend so much time here? You just trying to catch the small.profits from making use of the "random walk"? I guess as you lack the vision of this company to succeed, and get over the two listing others wsit in the next 6-12 months, and the gradual business building. So if you are not here for this, just trade the random walk, thats ok, but needless to ask frequently the other aspect.

Also assessing the possibility and probability if a far larger company would buy out the whole stuff even before the profit generating stage.

Thanks that was also my idea.

Competitors burden each other, we are becoming more attractive from many aspects

Kat, patience.

I understand every retail want to read spectacular RNS every week.

But why cant accept, they are doing their job which takes time.

My usual question: what period was the longest you didnt check the sp?

I mean apart from night when you slept.

One day? Thre hours?

:-)

Not intend to mock,but really.

I do hope my two main focus in investments (rec. tech - litigaitons) wont intersect..

Anyway an interesting read:

https://x.com/i/status/2060586835819270376

Thats an interesting question.

Bifurcation rejection may be good for a quicker procedure, and usually we welcome that, and get it as a sign the tribunal more likely lean towards a positive decision for us. ( at the same time, till jurisdiction is not decided, that risk is always out there...)

The sp may evolve as the fun slogan says "gradually then suddenly" , but I think this case, from an investor point of view may be more interesting in a year (after other widely followed cases like PAT and AMM and EQX with 6-12 month lag. ) Apart from any possible early setrlement which chance I cant estimate .

:-)

This amendmend will be significant thats is certain.

In another case, a Mexico related arbitration, partly gold partly silver lwhich has risen a bit more) the claimant just updated its claim fron 1 bn to 2.68 bn with its response. The original value was submitted last march, and was calculated prior to that.

So I think PAT is going to raise its claim at least to 2-2,5 bn.

The several bn market cap is what I struggle to umderstand.

Eventually EMAT through Mamadou will step into strategic partnership with MKAR? (And MKA and Hypromag?)

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/brendanjephcott_rareearths-electricvehicles-ndpr-share-7460851142382768128-BET_/?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAE3F3aEBI51t2X87AvVTNdT9YjeGDfoOVqU&utm_campaign=share_via

Under what price could a CPTK share worth buying and considered undervaluen compared to planmed MKAR listing value?

May be a total nonsense, but anyone here plans to buy CPTK shares or warrants before the merge?

Risks are clear.

Does anyone have any math on that?

I have told you here a few times about D. Mamadou. Eventually he may have a key role in our future.

Wow.

AMM has just amended its claim with its response. From 1 bn to 2.6 bn.

Market.cap vs Claim is thus 1 %...

https://ceo.ca/@GlobeNewswire/almaden-provides-update-on-arbitration-process-with-e42ff

Vica versa:

MKAR may be hyoed and fly why MKA still in the UK mud.

So MKA lonng / MKAR short when it is extreem.

Thats why it would be an even better opportunity if MKA was also listed in the US. Some said US investors dont like trading /investing in the UK. Maybe MKA 's canadian volume eould rise drastically.

I wonder if - as these are not that high volume stocks to say the least - we can be the arbitraga force. Every now and them the value should meet each other, so in MKA over /MKAR undervaluation a spread bet could be done (shorting MKAR amd buying MKA) . Thia could stretch exremely, but only for temporarily..

D. Mamadou (EMAT) also on board...

https://x.com/i/status/2057356234479513909